Article View: aus.computers.linux
Article #47375Re: Difference in RedHat releases.
From: Jason Stokes
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 00:00
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 00:00
19 lines
1181 bytes
1181 bytes
In article <369906F5.C2AFEF0F@wantree.com.au>, Regit Young <regit@wantree.com.au> wrote: >I've just installed RH5.2 via ftp (a full 11 hours!!!). Prior to 5.2, I >have used 4.6 and 5.0. Having to wait that long makes me wonder if it is >all worth it. The question is, what are the differences between >releases? Is there a "why upgrade" articles on these? Security patches, latest versions of all the packages... Linux is moving forward all the time. You know, it's usually easier and cheaper just to get the latest CD-ROM. Your local Linux user group will have someone with a CD burner who can do you a copy, or you can just order one quite cheaply from lsl.com.au or Cetus Tech. -- Jason Stokes: jstok@bluedog.apana.org.au
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<77cita$hpo$1@reader1.reader.news.ozemail.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<369906F5.C2AFEF0F@wantree.com.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 102983,34bd1cf747614f34 X-Google-Attributes: gid102983,public From: jstok@SPAMBLOCKED.apana.org.au (Jason Stokes) Subject: Re: Difference in RedHat releases. Date: 1999/01/11 Message-ID: <77cita$hpo$1@reader1.reader.news.ozemail.net> X-Deja-AN: 431188701 References: <369906F5.C2AFEF0F@wantree.com.au> Organization: OzEmail Ltd. Newsgroups: aus.computers.linux