🚀 go-pugleaf

I have exactly the same opinion except that NT4 had a few problems and was
probably slightly more difficult than RedHat. Although I am more experienced
in RedHat installs than NT.

I think that the only reason that M$ software is considered easier is that
everyone is used to it. If people knew the same amount about Linux as they
do about M$ then Linux would win hands down.

Tony Langdon (tlang@freeway.DIALix.oz.au) wrote:
: It's 19 Nov 97  20:09,
: We'll return to doug@cia.com.au and All's
: discussion of Linux Distribution

:  do> well ill add my 2 cents wrth, i nstalled slackware 3.3 from from
:  do> infomagic and its easier than NT40

: Being experienced in both Linux and NT, I'd rate them as follows:

: NT4 - easiest
: Red Hat 4.2 - Not far behind NT
: Slackware 3 - more fiddly than the above and requires more expertise.

: Of the 3, RH is the most functional out of the box.

: ... Captain, it's the Death Star!  We mu*^%#&%$#NO CARRIER
: --
: | Fidonet:  Tony Langdon 3:632/367.2
: | Internet: tlang@freeway.DIALix.oz.au
: |
: | Freeway Internet Gateway, Melbourne, Australia.  For information about
: | our services and conditions of use, e-mail:
: | info@freeway.DIALix.oz.au, to receive a copy of the FAQ.

--