Re: Linux/Win95b machines

Article View: aus.computers.linux

Article #54775

Back to aus.computers.linux Previous Next

#54775

From: Nathan D
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 00:00

20 lines
1178 bytes

Deniz <bilal@alphalink.com.au> wrote 

> 	Regarding Linux's LILO. Is it reliable to boot win95b? at 32bit FAT?
I have Win95B, but don't use the 32bit FAT.  Works O.K. for me

> Can linux handle 32bit FAT at all? Or should I reformat to 16? Or get an
> O/S selector software? Help much appreciated.
I believe there are sites that offer a 'patch' for the 32 bit stuff.  As I don't need it
I'm not sure where.

> PS. Can you please reply to my email,
Yes
> 'cause I don't thing I'll be coming here for a while.
foolish, foolish.  *Lots* to be learned in the newsgroups  :)

regards, 
 Nathan.

    Please remove ANTI_SPAM  when replying.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <01bcc0c4$a9386660$0200a8c0@nadan.nadan.com.au>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <341A7CDA.1B996168@alphalink.com.au>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 102983,13334f99badef7a
X-Google-Attributes: gid102983,public
From: "Nathan D" <nathand@avon.net_anti-spam>
Subject: Re: Linux/Win95b machines
Date: 1997/09/14
Message-ID: <01bcc0c4$a9386660$0200a8c0@nadan.nadan.com.au>
X-Deja-AN: 272328428
Cache-Post-Path: oak.avon.net.au!unknown@ppp22.avon.net.au
References: <341A7CDA.1B996168@alphalink.com.au>
Organization: iiNet Technologies
Reply-To: "Nathan D" <root@127.0.0.1>
Newsgroups: aus.computers.linux

Reply to Parent Message