Article View: aus.computers.linux
Article #54912Re: Using MI/X-free X server
From: Andrew Mather
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 00:00
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 00:00
63 lines
3083 bytes
3083 bytes
Maksim Lin wrote: > > Has anyone had any expereince using the free MI/X x-server win95 version I have the MI/X server as well as Xwin32 on my Win95 machine talking to RH4.1 with 2.0.30 kernel compiled for IP Masq'ing to the Internet. I can run most Apps I've tried OK, although I still haven't found a way to start them without a telnet. I have suffered some similar problems to you though. - Keep getting messages about the server not supporting the Shape > extension from Xlib (whatever that is) Haven't seen any of these. > - the file dialog and menus on programs like xdvi and ghostscript get > "erased" with either all white or all black when ever I drag the mouse > pointer across them. Yep, Graphics does a few weird things. eg: if I have an Image on the root window and the Win95 scrrensaver kicks in, when returning to the machine, the root window is back to a single colour unless I drag the Xterm or whatever, which reveals the image underneath, so i have to use it like a paintbrush to get my image back. That's my main problem with it though, but I'm not a heavy user. > On the more general networking front, is it supposed to take about 3 > minutes for a login promt to come up when I telent into my linux box from > the win95's (using 10M ethernet cards ! and doing nothing else on the > network, ping reports response of ~ 3.5ms !) ? Ditto, unless I'm connected with PPP to the Internet, in which case it's heaps quick to connect to the local machine. I think it must be routing related, as My Win95 has the Linux machine in its hosts file and vice versa, so I don't know if it's DNS realted. Any help here MUCH appreciated ! > - is root allowed to login via telent, as at the moment all other users > except root are allowed, so I have to keep logging in as something else and > then using su ! Nope, not with RedHat, although this can be changed I believe (but don't know how and haven't worried.) > Apart from these problems, MI/X is really a very good product for the > price (free) and seems to be the only freeware X server available, so > congrats to MicroImanges for putting it out. Yep, I'm impressed with MI/X too. Xwin32 isn't bad either, but I can't remember where I got it. Please cc any replies to my E-mail (remove the NO_SPAM_THANX) as this server is up and down like a yo-yo at the moment. Thanks, Andrew
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<33F2FEAA.2B00@woody.agvic.gov.au_NO_SPAM_THANX>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<5su6b9$60f$1@lucy.cc.swin.edu.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 102983,bd37527e51712bed,start X-Google-Attributes: gid102983,public X-Google-Thread: 10669a,bd37527e51712bed,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10669a,public From: Andrew Mather <mathera@woody.agvic.gov.au_NO_SPAM_THANX> Subject: Re: Using MI/X-free X server Date: 1997/08/14 Message-ID: <33F2FEAA.2B00@woody.agvic.gov.au_NO_SPAM_THANX> X-Deja-AN: 264159974 References: <5su6b9$60f$1@lucy.cc.swin.edu.au> To: Maksim Lin <933784@bud.swin.edu.au> Organization: DNRE (Agriculture) Reply-To: mathera@woody.agvic.gov.au_NO_SPAM_THANX Newsgroups: aus.computers.linux,comp.os.linux.networking