🚀 go-pugleaf

Michael Funk <mwfunk@uncc.campus.mci.net> wrote:
: On Thu, 31 Jul 1997 21:22:28 +0100, Guy William Hayton <ariel@hayton.demon.co.uk> wrote:
: >
: >I was wondering if using the dynamic libraries (in other words install
: >Motif at a small cost) speeded things up. With my limited experience I
: >deduce that the delays can be related to the loading of the static
: >libararies.
: >
: >Does anybody have any real experience of this...

: Unfortunately the dynamic version isn't much faster on my system.  The
: problem seems to be that it uses huge amounts of memory.  But, I've only
: got 16 MB.  I've seen posts from people with 32 MB complaining that it
: was still too slow!  Are there any 64 MB folks out there using it?  Is
: 64 MB enough for decent performance?

	Depends on how you define "decent."  ;)

:  I'm wondering (a) just how much memory is enough for StarOffice

	It doesn't swap w/64MBs.

: and (b) once the memory issues are taken care of, how is performance?

	Quite slow, unfortunately.  I was hoping that the dynamically
linked version might be faster.  Cfg: P133, 64MB, static StarOffice
version.
	Anybody have comments on the speed comparison between Applix &
StarOffice before I run out and buy the former?


-- 

- Steve

spach@primenet.com

I'd rather win nothing than Win95.