Article View: aus.computers.linux
Article #55450What would you *like* to see in a pro-Linux article?
From: Tony Langdon
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 1997 00:00
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 1997 00:00
87 lines
5118 bytes
5118 bytes
It's 12 Jun 97 09:48, We'll return to broom@fit.qut.edu.au and All's discussion of What would you *like* to see in a pro-Linux article? br> I'd most like to see a balanced article that addresses both the br> advantages and disadvantages of Linux. Writing an inaccurate, br> overly-pro Linux article would hurt everyone involved: you, the br> magazine, any newbies that get burnt, and of course Linux itself. Good point. As I mentioned the other day, Linux is not for everyone, but it should be more well known so those who would benefit can try it out. :-) br> From a home user's perspective, Linux comes with a much greater br> range of usable software, so you that when you've finally bought br> your new computer, it can do something - you don't need to rush br> out and buy another $1000 worth of software. If you're on a br> budget (and who isn't), it might be enough. If you're not, some br> commercial packages are starting to become available, although br> they are still fairly rare at the moment. Yes, a typical installation from a major distribution contains a lot of useful software. The other advantage is that if you do need more s/w, it's more often than not a free download off the Net, with no rego fees. :-) br> The major problem with Linux at home is getting it installed, and br> having someone to talk to regarding the inevitable problems that br> will occur. With Windows, the computer supplier will perform these I'd agree with that, as well as the inevitable steep learning curve for new UNIX/Linux users. :-) br> roles for you. However, few suppliers can/will do that for Linux yet. br> The alternative is the various user groups. However, you would still br> want to be fairly confident technically. (Not that it's hard - I Most people have no idea about Linux (or any other non-Windoze) OS. I've mentioned things like OS/2 and Linux at work, and everyone else just says "Oooh, that's too hard"! ;) Needless to say, a recent demo of my Linux Samba server being accessed by Windows machines raised a little interest. :-) br> just upgraded my system by installing Redhat 4.1 from scratch. Except br> for a small hiccup due to my dated hardware, it was a breeze.) Same here, after a little RTFM. :) br> If you haven't got used to the DOS / Microsoft Windows, then *using* br> Linux + X Windows isn't technically hard, despite all claims br> otherwise. My 5.7 year old can login, start X manually, and start and br> use a few simple applications (Xpaint, The Gimp, Lyx, a number of br> simple X games), and logout. The basic apps, like mail (pine, elm), news (tin), and many X applications are a breeze to use. br> Performing system administration and command line work is naturally br> much more difficult, but this is a matter of gradually learning and br> becoming more confident. The DOS / Microsoft Windows world is just br> as hard. A popular Australian personal computer magazine, similar to br> the one you described, recently ran some "Workshop" articles on br> installing Win95 OSR2, and that certainly looked pretty daunting. br> Anyone capable of doing that would also be able to learn to administer br> Linux. However, Linux (and other command line driven systems) are actually easier to administer and support remotely (i.e. via telnet, or assisting someone over the phone). A text based telnet connection is all you need to administer a Linux box. Windows NT requires a lot more s/w at the client end to administer it remotely. Similarly for support, it's a lot easier to say "type pico /etc/rc.d/rc.net" "Change the line that says ifconfig eth0 192.168.2.2 to ifconfig eth1 192.168.2.2, press CTRL-X, then enter", than say "Open Control Panel, networking... Now under TCP/Ip, there's a way to change your IP address, find the little box near the top, etc, etc". :-) ... ARRRRRGGGHHH!!!! ... Tension breaker, had to be done. -- | Fidonet: Tony Langdon 3:632/367.2 | Internet: tlang@freeway.DIALix.oz.au | | Freeway Internet Gateway, Melbourne, Australia. For information about | our services and conditions of use, e-mail: | info@freeway.DIALix.oz.au, to receive a copy of the FAQ.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6e5_9706151133@freeway.DIALix.oz.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<vznzpszrxav.fsf@intruder.iassf.easams.com.au> <339F2B4E.6FC3@fit.qut.edu.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1103af,568c0a2f5b9aca5b X-Google-Attributes: gid1103af,public X-Google-Thread: ff9be,568c0a2f5b9aca5b X-Google-Attributes: gidff9be,public X-Google-Thread: fcfb9,568c0a2f5b9aca5b X-Google-Attributes: gidfcfb9,public X-Google-Thread: 102983,568c0a2f5b9aca5b X-Google-Attributes: gid102983,public From: tlang@freeway.DIALix.oz.au (Tony Langdon) Subject: What would you *like* to see in a pro-Linux article? Date: 1997/06/14 Message-ID: <6e5_9706151133@freeway.DIALix.oz.au> X-Deja-AN: 248489903 References: <vznzpszrxav.fsf@intruder.iassf.easams.com.au> <339F2B4E.6FC3@fit.qut.edu.au> Organization: Fidonet: Freeway Usenet <=> FTN gateway Newsgroups: aus.computers.linux,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc X-FTN-To: broom@fit.qut.edu.au