🚀 go-pugleaf

>>> I'm running Linux on a 486DX33 w 16 Mb.
>>
>>My home Linux rides 386DX40/8MB without FPU (burnt up by mistake) - X
>>are working (but no impression).
>>Anyone bids less?  ;-)
>
>There's someone surfing the web with an old IBM PS/2 with 16 MHz 386 and 6
>Mbytes of RAM, running the QNX demodisk.  :-)

Hm...  Not bad, but I've got a few minimal systems out there myself.

1) Dialup gateway: 386SX-25, 4MB RAM, 120MB HD.  Runs Linux 2.X It's a
   wee bit slowish, but it does what I need it to do.

2) Notebook: 386SX-25, 4MB RAM, 120MB HD.  Runs Windows95. (Yes, I
   know, I should be ashamed- but I couldn't squeeze the latest
   kernels on without dinking with them)  You could _call_ it running-
   if you're **real** patient with the machine.  It was done as a
   demonstration of why Win95 is NOT faster than Win 3.11 and that it
   _WILL_ barely run (Though hideously sllloooow) in this
   configuration.

-- 
Frank C. Earl
Earl Consulting Services
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to USC 47, there is a $500 per incident charge for each and 
every piece of Unsolicited Commercial Email (UCE) sent to this or any
of my other addresses.  Sending UCE's to any of my addresses implys 
general acceptance of these terms.  (My Return addresses are _deliberately_
broken to interfere with mailing list generators- remove "-no-spam-" every 
place in the address to reply.)