Article View: aus.computers.linux
Article #55543Why use Linux ?? hard to learn....is it worth it ????
From: Tony Langdon
Date: Mon, 26 May 1997 00:00
Date: Mon, 26 May 1997 00:00
63 lines
3278 bytes
3278 bytes
It's 23 May 97 19:06, We'll return to leonb@dsdata.DIALix.oz.au and All's discussion of Why use Linux ?? hard to learn....is it worth it ???? le> : I was told Linux is a better OS, but harder to learn and prefer by le> techie. le> Linux truly is a better operating system. It has stability, le> accessibility standard-compliance and freeness that Windows hasn't and le> never will have. I run a reasonable TCP/IP router and network server on a 386 under Linux with 4MB. OK, it's a little slow sometimes, but try doing that with any version of Windows (or other OS for that matter). le> It is also smaller and more efficient, and you don't _have_ to run in le> GUI (X-windows) mode to do useful things. I'm sure there is more than le> one project afoot to make Linux a fire-and-forget proposition too (and le> some Linux people object to that idea). I'm not sure how this can be achieved, but once setup, Linux can be almost a turnkey affair in my application (i have diald to make outgoing calls on demand). le> : How much is Linux better compare to MS windows ?? le> How much better is an Oka than a Commodore? (-: A better answer might be "will it do what you want to do better than anything else? Often, that's "yes". le> : What are the main reasons people migrating to Linux ?? le> Sick of paying Micro$loth's pound of flesh. Sick of things crashing. le> Want to edit without having to fire up an entire GUI -- and multi-task le> meanwhile. Want to be able to change a thing I don't like or add a le> feature to a program I'm using. Many things. Amony many others. :-) le> : Linux does not have word or excel equivalents (most people buy a le> computer : just for that), isnt it lower productivity ?? le> Whatever you would use a DOS machine for, only timesharing; a Windows le> machine for, only reliably and for free; a SCO machine for only for le> free; a Mac for only with more buttons on the mouse. As for other OSes le> on top, you can run DOS programs within Linux. You can also run le> Sinclair, Atari, Amstrad and other programs, if you feel masochistic le> (-: I use it for Internet connectivity. Linux's networking is far more flexible than that of (say) Windows NT. Need wierd routing? Just pop the commands in rc.net, and all's fine. :-) In NT, it's not as easy to go beyond the mundane. :-) ... What do you mean? You actually read this Tagline?!? -- | Fidonet: Tony Langdon 3:632/367.2 | Internet: tlang@freeway.DIALix.oz.au | | Freeway Internet Gateway, Melbourne, Australia. For information about | our services and conditions of use, e-mail: | info@freeway.DIALix.oz.au, to receive a copy of the FAQ.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5ea_9705270701@freeway.DIALix.oz.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<5lprjd$ghn$1@hakea.services.adelaide.edu.au> <5m3j5k$ajv@dsdata.DIALix.oz.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 102983,a1639a817f885f4a X-Google-Attributes: gid102983,public From: tlang@freeway.DIALix.oz.au (Tony Langdon) Subject: Why use Linux ?? hard to learn....is it worth it ???? Date: 1997/05/26 Message-ID: <5ea_9705270701@freeway.DIALix.oz.au> X-Deja-AN: 244095308 References: <5lprjd$ghn$1@hakea.services.adelaide.edu.au> <5m3j5k$ajv@dsdata.DIALix.oz.au> Organization: Fidonet: Freeway Usenet <=> FTN gateway Newsgroups: aus.computers.linux X-FTN-To: leonb@dsdata.DIALix.oz.au