Article View: aus.computers.linux
Article #57091Re: Is RedHat 4.0 ELF ?
From: James C. McPherson
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 1996 00:00
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 1996 00:00
17 lines
993 bytes
993 bytes
On 18 Nov 1996 23:47:12 GMT, dark Loki <s2172730@cse.unsw.edu.au> wrote: > I'm not a complete Unix novice (though hardly a hacker ;) but I still >don't understand what difference ELF will make - is RedHat 4.0 ELF and if >not, is that a drawback? RedHat 4.0 is ELF. ELF is apparently more efficient for compiling shared libraries. Opinions on this vary, however - I think c.o.l.* have had flame wars about it in the past. jcm Historian/InterLibraryLoans/ITLO/Branch Sysmangler mljmcphe@dingo.cc.uq.edu.au j.mcpherson@central1.library.uq.edu.au
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<32912f63.11231613@news.uq.edu.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<56qsi0$5fu@mirv.unsw.edu.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 102983,d7c4de6728be4b0f X-Google-Attributes: gid102983,public From: j.mcpherson@central1.library.uq.oz.au (James C. McPherson) Subject: Re: Is RedHat 4.0 ELF ? Date: 1996/11/19 Message-ID: <32912f63.11231613@news.uq.edu.au> X-Deja-AN: 197347980 references: <56qsi0$5fu@mirv.unsw.edu.au> organization: University of Queensland newsgroups: aus.computers.linux