Article View: aus.computers.linux
Article #57139Re: RedHat versus Debian
From: RICHARD FREEMAN
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 00:00
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 00:00
71 lines
3762 bytes
3762 bytes
PC> @FROM :paul@moe.cyclades.com N PC> @UMSGID :<54f4eg$m8q12@ha2.rdc1.sfba.home.com> N PC> @UFOLLOW:01aus.computers.linux,comp.os.linux.setup N PC> @UNEWSGR:01aus.computers.linux,comp.os.linux.setup N PC>Path: asstdc.scgt.oz.au!metro!metro!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu! PC>feed1.news.erols.com!insync!enews.sgi.com!newshub1.home.com!news.rdc1.s PC>home.com!not-for-mail PC>From: paul@moe.cyclades.com (Paul C) PC>Newsgroups: aus.computers.linux,comp.os.linux.setup PC>Subject: Re: RedHat versus Debian PC>Followup-To: aus.computers.linux,comp.os.linux.setup PC>Date: 21 Oct 1996 06:15:44 GMT PC>Organization: @Home Network PC>Lines: 37 PC>Message-ID: <54f4eg$m8q12@ha2.rdc1.sfba.home.com> PC>References: <32679917.20CA98C3@tmx.mhs.oz.au> PC>NNTP-Posting-Host: c109522-a.frmt1.sfba.home.com PC>X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0] PC>Xref: asstdc.scgt.oz.au aus.computers.linux:8620 comp.os.linux.setup:7 PC>Carl Renneberg (renneber@tmx.mhs.oz.au) wrote: PC>: I have RedHat 3.0.3 installed on my system, but for various reasons PC>: I'm thinking of installing Debian 1.1.4 instead. PC>: PC>: I'd appreciate hearing from people who have tried both RedHat and PC>: Debian. PC>: PC>: How do you think these distributions compare? If you switched from on PC>: distribution to the other, what made you switch? PC>We support the three main distributions (Slackware, Debian, and Red Hat PC>at Cyclades, so I have had some experience with all of them. PC>Some people claim that RH is easier to install than Debian, but I had n PC>trouble with either. Debian is targeted to the user with experience; PC>it has a great package tool, but it assumes that you know what you want PC>(The installation pre-selects a base set of packages that are required. PC>Once you get them installed, then they work pretty much the same. Some PC>people have trouble with RH in getting a newly-compiled kernel to boot, PC>but it's probably a case of needing to RTFM. PC>RH has several paid people maintaining the distribution. PC>Debian is maintained by around a hundred volunteers, each maintaining a PC>couple of packages. Upgrades tend to be quicker; bug fixes faster. PC>Personally, I run Debian on both my home and primary work machine. I just have a infomagic 6 cd rom sept 96 release in hand including RedHat 3.03 slackware and debian distributions. I don't want to come across all but hard to pick one. I had a quick look at docs. It seems to me that RedHat supports in-place upgrade but with older kernel(1.2.13) while Slackware (kernel 2.0) need to be installed from scratch when upgrading according to the docs. My questions are: how difficult is it to upgrade RedHat's kernel ? Can I use the sources with cdrom(2.0.12) to recompile the kernel and upgrade it to RedHat and other distributions ? can packages from different distributions be across used ? Are these packages share the some features ? If not, which one has more features over the others ? Any tips and info are greatly appreciated. --- * PW *
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8CC22E3.024E000954.uuout@mcc.com.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3235AF60.2A4D@trw.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 102983,5eb45b939c7acd9e X-Google-Attributes: gid102983,public From: richard.freeman@mcc.com.au (RICHARD FREEMAN) Subject: Re: RedHat versus Debian Date: 1996/11/13 Message-ID: <8CC22E3.024E000954.uuout@mcc.com.au> X-Deja-AN: 196248425 distribution: world references: <3235AF60.2A4D@trw.com> organization: My Computer Company BBS, Australia [+61] (02) 565-1044 reply-to: richard.freeman@mcc.com.au (RICHARD FREEMAN) newsgroups: aus.computers.linux x-mailer: PCBoard/UUOUT Version 1.20