🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: aus.computers.linux
Article #57139

Re: RedHat versus Debian

#57139
From: RICHARD FREEMAN
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 00:00
71 lines
3762 bytes
PC> @FROM   :paul@moe.cyclades.com                                       N
PC> @UMSGID :<54f4eg$m8q12@ha2.rdc1.sfba.home.com>                       N
PC> @UFOLLOW:01aus.computers.linux,comp.os.linux.setup                   N
PC> @UNEWSGR:01aus.computers.linux,comp.os.linux.setup                   N
PC>Path: asstdc.scgt.oz.au!metro!metro!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!
PC>feed1.news.erols.com!insync!enews.sgi.com!newshub1.home.com!news.rdc1.s
PC>home.com!not-for-mail
PC>From: paul@moe.cyclades.com (Paul C)
PC>Newsgroups: aus.computers.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
PC>Subject: Re: RedHat versus Debian
PC>Followup-To: aus.computers.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
PC>Date: 21 Oct 1996 06:15:44 GMT
PC>Organization: @Home Network
PC>Lines: 37
PC>Message-ID: <54f4eg$m8q12@ha2.rdc1.sfba.home.com>
PC>References: <32679917.20CA98C3@tmx.mhs.oz.au>
PC>NNTP-Posting-Host: c109522-a.frmt1.sfba.home.com
PC>X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0]
PC>Xref: asstdc.scgt.oz.au aus.computers.linux:8620 comp.os.linux.setup:7

PC>Carl Renneberg (renneber@tmx.mhs.oz.au) wrote:

PC>: I have RedHat 3.0.3 installed on my system, but for various reasons
PC>: I'm thinking of installing Debian 1.1.4 instead.
PC>: 
PC>: I'd appreciate hearing from people who have tried both RedHat and
PC>: Debian.
PC>: 
PC>: How do you think these distributions compare? If you switched from on
PC>: distribution to the other, what made you switch?

PC>We support the three main distributions (Slackware, Debian, and Red Hat
PC>at Cyclades, so I have had some experience with all of them.

PC>Some people claim that RH is easier to install than Debian, but I had n
PC>trouble with either.  Debian is targeted to the user with experience;
PC>it has a great package tool, but it assumes that you know what you want
PC>(The installation pre-selects a base set of packages that are required.

PC>Once you get them installed, then they work pretty much the same.  Some
PC>people have trouble with RH in getting a newly-compiled kernel to boot,
PC>but it's probably a case of needing to RTFM.

PC>RH has several paid people maintaining the distribution.

PC>Debian is maintained by around a hundred volunteers, each maintaining a
PC>couple of packages.  Upgrades tend to be quicker; bug fixes faster.

PC>Personally, I run Debian on both my home and primary work machine.

I just have a infomagic 6 cd rom sept 96 release in hand 
including RedHat 3.03 slackware and debian distributions. I don't
want to come across all but hard to pick one. I had a quick 
look at docs. It seems to me that RedHat supports in-place 
upgrade but with older kernel(1.2.13) while Slackware (kernel 2.0)
need to be installed from scratch when upgrading according to the
docs. My questions are: how difficult is it to upgrade RedHat's
kernel ? Can I use the sources with cdrom(2.0.12) to recompile 
the kernel and upgrade it to RedHat and other distributions ? can
packages from different distributions be across used ? Are these
packages share the some features ? If not, which one has more
features over the others ?

Any tips and info are greatly appreciated.




---
 * PW *
Technical Details
Message-ID: <8CC22E3.024E000954.uuout@mcc.com.au>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <3235AF60.2A4D@trw.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 102983,5eb45b939c7acd9e
X-Google-Attributes: gid102983,public
From: richard.freeman@mcc.com.au (RICHARD FREEMAN)
Subject: Re: RedHat versus Debian
Date: 1996/11/13
Message-ID: <8CC22E3.024E000954.uuout@mcc.com.au>
X-Deja-AN: 196248425
distribution: world
references: <3235AF60.2A4D@trw.com>
organization: My Computer Company BBS, Australia [+61] (02) 565-1044
reply-to: richard.freeman@mcc.com.au (RICHARD FREEMAN)
newsgroups: aus.computers.linux
x-mailer: PCBoard/UUOUT Version 1.20