🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: aus.computers.linux
Article #57595

Re: Do shared libraries save memory or disk space

#57595
From: Thorfinn
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 00:00
29 lines
1563 bytes
In article <518ap6$a2v@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>, Tyson Richard DOWD wrote:
>But I suspect that the Linux fork is vfork anyway (no evidence, just
>seems silly not to do it this way - cost is low, and most programs just
>fork and then exec anyway, so why bother copying all that stuff).

Correct. :)

FORK(2)             Linux Programmer's Manual             FORK(2)
[.....]
DESCRIPTION
[.....]
       Under  Linux,  fork  is  implemented  using  copy-on-write
       pages, so the only penalty incurred by fork  is  the  time
       and memory required to duplicate the parent's page tables,
       and to create a unique task structure for the child.
[.....]
BUGS
       Under Linux, vfork is merely an alias for fork.
[.....]
Linux 0.99.11              24 July 1993                         1

Later,

    Thorf

-- 
-- <a href="http://www.zip.com.au/~thorfinn"> thorfinn@zip.com.au </a>
Bell Labs Unix -- Reach out and grep someone.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <slrn53fvus.rj9.thorfinn@jog3.zip.com.au>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <513nvh$2hv@nhj.nlc.net.au> <515cso$su7@metro.ucc.su.OZ.AU> <518ap6$a2v@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1103af,69c6938f9ae135ef
X-Google-Attributes: gid1103af,public
X-Google-Thread: 102983,69c6938f9ae135ef
X-Google-Attributes: gid102983,public
From: thorfinn@zip.com.au (Thorfinn)
Subject: Re: Do shared libraries save memory or disk space
Date: 1996/09/12
Message-ID: <slrn53fvus.rj9.thorfinn@jog3.zip.com.au>
X-Deja-AN: 180139979
references: <513nvh$2hv@nhj.nlc.net.au> <515cso$su7@metro.ucc.su.OZ.AU> <518ap6$a2v@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>
organization: None.
reply-to: thorfinn@zip.com.au
newsgroups: aus.computers.linux,comp.os.linux.misc