Re: XEmacs vs Emacs

Article View: aus.computers.linux

Article #57639

Back to aus.computers.linux Previous Next

#57639

From: Andrew Cosgriff
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 1996 00:00

21 lines
1553 bytes

** "Kent" == Kent Tong <freemant@wr.com.au> writes:

Kent> Given XEmacs and Emacs, which one should I use? Which one supports
Kent> syntax highlighting?

They both do.  XEmacs also supports proportional fonts, if you happen to like
them, as well as inlined images (xpm, png, jpeg and gif i think), sound, as
well as other things I can't think of right now.

I use XEmacs.  But plain Emacs isn't so bad.

you can read about XEmacs at http://www.xemacs.org and ftp it from
ftp://ftp.xemacs.org

Enjoy,
 Andrew.
-- 
 - Andrew J. Cosgriff --------------------------------- PGP/MIME mail preferred
 * ajc@bing.wattle.id.au * http://netspace.net.au/~ajc * Phone : +61 14 856 122
                          Yow!  Am I having fun yet?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <wi3f0r9lb0.fsf@unico.com.au>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <50un2a$bu4@metro.usyd.edu.au>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 102983,7c7911e0fd80f550
X-Google-Attributes: gid102983,public
From: Andrew Cosgriff <ajc@unico.com.au>
Subject: Re: XEmacs vs Emacs
Date: 1996/09/10
Message-ID: <wi3f0r9lb0.fsf@unico.com.au>
X-Deja-AN: 179597478
distribution: inet
sender: ajc@mayfly
references: <50un2a$bu4@metro.usyd.edu.au>
content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
x-face: PBPJ+.AE`FBN4$}H<dIo+^`A-G%mJTXXP$^4bBox##5=oF{G\[:0|sNlr%~H1,>rwwEh<qq.dHRpu8ftJ\'14l]<x(nRD>J)x?-5$MQ%Z)svNR@Q\WG6[GDr,}a@8ULwGWBsk,Pqxm!Z<lnD(Skwwe$j+<0g6N6z}>-
organization: UNICO Computer Systems, Melbourne, Australia
x-uri: <URL:http://netspace.net.au/~ajc>
x-attribution: ajc
mime-version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.69)
x-pgp-key-id: C7BD53F5
newsgroups: aus.computers.linux

Reply to Parent Message