Re: Red Hat or Slackware

Article View: aus.computers.linux

Article #58941

Back to aus.computers.linux Previous Next

#58941

From: Matt McLeod
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 1996 00:00

15 lines
1119 bytes

michp@ecr.mu.oz.au (Michael PAPASIMEON) writes:

> I've just gotten a hold of the Infomagic Linux 5 CD set and I haven't
> decided whether to install Slackware 3.0 or Red Hat 2.1 (I'm running
> Slackware 2.2 at the moment).

I'd go for Red Hat over Slackware. It's been put together really
well, and the various packages are easily upgradable.  BTW,
there's a new Red Hat release available now, so you might want
to consider obtaining that instead.

--
Matt McLeod               |   Co-ordinator, Hunter Network Association
matt@toaster.hna.com.au   |   Sysadmin, Brushtail Public Access Unix
   Unless otherwise stated, this post doesn't reflect HNA policy.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <960324.182433.1B7.rnr.matt@toaster.hna.com.au>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <4it4oo$aes@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 102983,a7be944c3c950d7b
X-Google-Attributes: gid102983,public
From: matt@toaster.hna.com.au (Matt McLeod)
Subject: Re: Red Hat or Slackware
Date: 1996/03/24
Message-ID: <960324.182433.1B7.rnr.matt@toaster.hna.com.au>
X-Deja-AN: 144056999
references: <4it4oo$aes@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>
organization: Hunter Network Association, Newcastle, Australia
newsgroups: aus.computers.linux

Reply to Parent Message