Article View: aus.computers.linux
Article #58971Re: Red Hat or Slackware
From: Andrew Howell
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 00:00
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 00:00
26 lines
1606 bytes
1606 bytes
Michael PAPASIMEON (michp@ecr.mu.oz.au) wrote:
: I've just gotten a hold of the Infomagic Linux 5 CD set and I haven't
: decided whether to install Slackware 3.0 or Red Hat 2.1 (I'm running
: Slackware 2.2 at the moment).
:
: I would be interested in finding out what other people's thoughts are
: on the two above mentioned distributions. Any reason to favour or
: recommend one over the other.
Well I actually I prefer Debian to both :) But if it was a choice between
Red Hat and Slackware, I'd take Red Hat every time, it's far more advanced.
Has a good packaging system, easy to upgrade. It's packages are up to date.
It's configurations aren't broken. Basically in my opinion Slackware is dead,
should do the linux community a favour and die out or collaborate with one
of the other distributions.
Andrew
--
Dehydration - 34%, Recollection of previous evening - 2%, embarrassment
factor - 91%. Advise repair schedule:- off line for 36 hours, re-boot
startup disk, and replace head - wow, what a night!
-- Kryten in Red Dwarf `The Last Day'
Andrew Howell andrew@it.com.au
Perth, Western Australia howellaa@cs.curtin.edu.au
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4jd6j0$4r6@starbug.it.com.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4it4oo$aes@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 102983,a7be944c3c950d7b X-Google-Attributes: gid102983,public From: andrew@toaster.it.com.au (Andrew Howell) Subject: Re: Red Hat or Slackware Date: 1996/03/28 Message-ID: <4jd6j0$4r6@starbug.it.com.au> X-Deja-AN: 144631915 references: <4it4oo$aes@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> organization: Informed Technology newsgroups: aus.computers.linux