🚀 go-pugleaf

Adrian Powell (awp@cray.com) wrote:
[...]

:      Hi,
:          Although I'm a big Unix advocate, I can see why experienced 
: computer users might choose WIN95 over Linux, and that is reliability.
: In my experience, although Linux runs well on more common machines,
: when you through in a Pentium with some of the latest h/w, things start
: to play up. It recently took me ages to fault fine a problem with a disk
: configuration which worked well under Win95.  And, this last weekend I
: suffered a kernel paniced which wreaked 10 Linux filesystems. This shouldn't 
: happen. I really still see linux as rather an experimental enviroment, but 
: hopefully we should see some stability  in coming years, which would be great.
Well, I do not know the final relase of Win95, but I tried a beta (summer this
year) and I did not spend more than 15 min to have the first error. I don't
know the terms in english, but something like "program stopped, press ok to
chancel programm". And I was just opening and closing some Windows (Might have
been a wrong one). 

So don't say commercial OS's have more stability.

Bye, Nils

--
Nils Bokermann      
Johanneswerkstr. 90        Phone: +49 521 891279
33613 Bielefeld            FAX:   +49 521 550116
Germany			 
nils@reality.owl.de	   Die Natur braucht Freunde -- Naturfreunde
_______________________________________________________________________________