🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: aus.computers.logic-prog
Article #542

Re: 128-bit processors?

#542
From: Scott Hublar
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 1996 00:00
13 lines
867 bytes
Do you mean a 128 bit PC processor?
If so, I don't believe I've ever seen anything faster than 
64 bit.  SGI and Sun sell some good systems.  
Even if you had a 128 bit processor, you'd have trouble
with bottlenecks created in all the IO sub-systems.

schmeck@ibm.net

Mike Todd <mtodd@nemonet.com> wrote in article
<01bb9490$5e004ca0$0db08acd@mtodd.nemonet.com>...
> Sorry, I forgot to post my address. mtodd@nemonet.com   Thanks!
> 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <01bb9bea$8f76ca00$5aeb48a6@IBM.IBM.NET>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <01bb9490$5e004ca0$0db08acd@mtodd.nemonet.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fd9bd,faae63242815cc2f
X-Google-Attributes: gidfd9bd,public
From: "Scott Hublar" <schmeck@ibm.net>
Subject: Re: 128-bit processors?
Date: 1996/09/06
Message-ID: <01bb9bea$8f76ca00$5aeb48a6@IBM.IBM.NET>
X-Deja-AN: 178860138
references: <01bb9490$5e004ca0$0db08acd@mtodd.nemonet.com>
organization: Jewish Hospital
newsgroups: aus.computers.logic-prog