🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: aus.computers.tex
Article #459

Ammunition to argue for first person & active voice wanted.

#459
From: A.Raman
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 1997 00:00
24 lines
1441 bytes

Hi I am using LaTeX to write up my dissertation already against the
mild disapproval of my thesis supervisor.  He would like me override
many LaTeX defaults which I am quite happy to do.  However, he insists
that I change my style of writing from using first person to third
person and from active to passive voice.  I prefer to say "The reasons
for my choice of this particular dataset are..." and he prefers the
safer "The reasons for this particular choice of dataset are...".

I am sure that although that style was quite popular some 10 years
ago, it is quite dated now.  However, I don't have much ammunition by
way of recent style manuals for Computer Science dissertations to
argue for this.  Any pointers that help me find them will be greatly
appreciated.

Further, I find that LaTeX does not do widow/orphan protection ---
there are even widow/orphan footnotes.  While I am not too perturbed
by this, I can see how this is going to be a source of another
small disagreement.

Many thanks.  Email replies please.

- &
Technical Details
Message-ID: <5af0m0$6if@cc-server9.massey.ac.nz>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10b0c4,7b1f4a475120bf35,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b0c4,public
From: A.Raman@massey.ac.nz
Subject: Ammunition to argue for first person & active voice wanted.
Date: 1997/01/02
Message-ID: <5af0m0$6if@cc-server9.massey.ac.nz>
X-Deja-AN: 207233533
organization: FIMS, Massey University
newsgroups: aus.computers.tex