Article View: aus.consumers
Article #8660A good clock radio
From: Ash Nallawalla
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 00:00
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 00:00
29 lines
1645 bytes
1645 bytes
This is a recommendation as a consumer and I have no financial
interest in the topic.
I was fed up with the poor quality of potentiometers ("volume
control" in this case) found in clock radios. I rarely
adjusted the volume on my clock radio, yet the control would go
scratchy very quickly, i.e. at certain settings there was no
volume. Eventually vibration would cause the setting to move
to one of these positions and I'd miss the alarm some mornings.
(Reminds me of hotel clock radios.) I have tossed out two such
radios (both had a phone too).
I took a good look at Target and decided against another
unit with a phone as the two choices both had very loose
pots, suggesting they could be bad designs. Going for just
a clock radio expanded the choices. I finally settled for
an Akai CR-5000 (made in China, as usual) for $59.
Not only does it have a very firm (geared) pot, it has other
features not seen in cheaper units, such as dual alarms,
the buzzer gets louder slowly, fast and slow forward
and fast and slow reverse settings, auto-sensing dimmer,
(FM) stereo speakers, battery backup. Sounds good and
I have no complaints so far.
--
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/ash
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Wej1yAnFBh108h@home.melbpc.org.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10a0c5,bf6d356056b19846,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10a0c5,public From: ash@home.melbpc.org.au (Ash Nallawalla) Subject: A good clock radio Date: 1997/01/10 Message-ID: <Wej1yAnFBh108h@home.melbpc.org.au> X-Deja-AN: 208920444 organization: Melbourne PC User Group, Australia reply-to: ash@melbpc.org.au newsgroups: aus.consumers