Article View: aus.consumers
Article #8715Re: Dangerous Computers
From: David Clayton
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 1996 00:00
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 1996 00:00
50 lines
2845 bytes
2845 bytes
Gordon.Newell@C031.aone.net.au (Gordon Newell) contributed the following: >In message <32b22fb2.14926704@news.mel.aone.net.au> - >dcstar@acslink.aone.net.au (David Clayton)Sun, 15 Dec 1996 21:16:35 GMT >writes: > >[edit] > >:>>I would like to know your background for making such statement. We are >:>>The switched mode power supply is one of the safest I can think of. >:>>From the very start in Colour TV some 25-30 years ago, you find very >:>>little wrong with these supplies. They very rarely have a disasterous >:>>burn out as had the standard supplies. >:>> >:>Except that there is no physical isolation from the mains supply - as >:>there would be with a double insulated transformer. > >The low voltage side of a switching power supply is isolated from the mains by >a large area of PCB and the switching transformer. The only connection between >the two is the feedback loop, usually through an opto-coupler. Seems pretty >well isolated to me. > The point I was making is that the "older" power supplies had double insulated transformers with the primary and secondary windings seperated by whatever was required to satisfy the local Australian power authorities. Compared to the switched mode supplies that I know about, this should provide a greater level of isolation that occurs now. If this *greater* level of isolation is actually required is a moot point, (it looks like we are living without it quite well at the moment), but it seems to me that the switched mode supplies can be made with varying level of isolation, and therefore safety, and we should be using the ones with the appropriate U.L. or whatever compliance, not dogey ones that the original post was warning us about. I don't know about you, but the blanket statements from another poster about all switch mode power supplies being safe, (and if they aren't, the company that makes them will go out of business, so be quiet!), just cause me to shake my head in amazement. Regards, David. ------------------------------------------------- David Clayton, e-mail: dcstar@acslink.aone.net.au Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. "Virtual Reality - Give it a rest, Actual Reality has me stressed enough as it is."
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<32b67cc5.3873282@news.mel.aone.net.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<E2CC9z.Kwv@metapro.com.au> <58sspj$q9n@opera.iinet.net.au><E2CC9z.Kwv@metapro.com.au> <58sspj$q9n@opera.iinet.net.au> <32b22fb2.14926704@news.mel.aone.net.au> <594u4q$174@news.mel.aone.net.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10a0c5,b7a2419f439272e0 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a0c5,public From: dcstar@acslink.aone.net.au (David Clayton) Subject: Re: Dangerous Computers Date: 1996/12/17 Message-ID: <32b67cc5.3873282@news.mel.aone.net.au> X-Deja-AN: 204765090 references: <E2CC9z.Kwv@metapro.com.au> <58sspj$q9n@opera.iinet.net.au><E2CC9z.Kwv@metapro.com.au> <58sspj$q9n@opera.iinet.net.au> <32b22fb2.14926704@news.mel.aone.net.au> <594u4q$174@news.mel.aone.net.au> organization: Customer of Access One Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia newsgroups: aus.consumers