Article View: aus.environment.conservation
Article #6063Re: conservation goals
From: HOXYGT
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 1995 00:00
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 1995 00:00
13 lines
1324 bytes
1324 bytes
In article <cathcon.1.000DF4BA@psinet.net.au>, cathcon@psinet.net.au says: > >Are there any groups out there who are trying to find out exactly what we need >to do to preserve species/biodiversity in our native forests.Which are the >high priority areas in terms of preserving most species,and the minimum areas >needed.If people saw clearcut specific goals they would be more likely to get >involved and help rather then just vaguely wish there was something they could >do.Does anyone know any groups trying to do this in an organised fashion? Agreed you are so right but to find what needs to be protected cost money and requires people experienced in the field. These people are expensive. Who will pay these consultants? Maybe private funds from donations could be used, but how many areas will be covered by these expensive surveys, not all of them! But then at least some is better than none.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4bda19$3l4@vector.wantree.com.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<cathcon.1.000DF4BA@psinet.net.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fdaee,affd1c75396c9fc6 X-Google-Attributes: gidfdaee,public From: rob@wantree.com.au (HOXYGT) Subject: Re: conservation goals Date: 1995/12/22 Message-ID: <4bda19$3l4@vector.wantree.com.au> X-Deja-AN: 122727307 references: <cathcon.1.000DF4BA@psinet.net.au> organization: Wantree Development newsgroups: aus.environment.conservation