Article View: aus.environment.conservation
Article #64Re: A simple, cost-free way to cut your annual household CO2 emissions by tonnes.
From: B J Foster
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:25
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:25
103 lines
5305 bytes
5305 bytes
hot frog wrote: > Here is a simple, cost-free method most households can use to reduce their > CO2 emissions, literally by tonnes. > > Step 1. Replace any incandescent light bulbs in your home, that are left on > for several hours a night, with compact fluorescent lightbulbs (CFLs). Unfortunately they contain mercury and if you don't dispose of them as 'hazardous waste' then we might all end up autistic. http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?articleId=4485da62-050d-4d02-96e2-331e8a58e596 On the positive side you can save energy. Australia will run out of coal supplies in about 500 years time, uranium in about 20,000 years and solar power in 20 google years. > > Step 2. Use the money you save on electricity to purchase accredited green > energy. Why should I pay more for it? > > That's it. These simple steps alone can reduce the amount of greenhouse gas > emitted to power your household by tonnes of CO2 annually, without it > costing you a cent. [#1] > > In the example below, just 4 bulbs were replaced but annual household CO2 > emissions were cut by more than 2 tonnes. > > > ======================== > > Example: > > Step 1. > > Four incandescent 60 Watt light bulbs, that are on for an average of 5 hours > a night each, consume > 4 x 60 x 5 x 365.25 Watt hours per year = 438300 Wh = 438.3 kWh, > which at 15.455c/kWh costs $67.74. > > The equivalent compact fluorescents use only 11W each, so the corresponding > figures are > 4 x 11 x 5 x 365.25 Watt hours per year = 80355 Wh = 80.355 kWh, > which at 15.455c/kWh costs $12.42. > > So, by changing four lightbulbs, $55.32 a year was saved on electricity.[#2] > > > Step 2. > > This amount was more than sufficient to purchase $50 worth (1655 kWh) of > green energy offsets, meaning that 1655 kWh of electricity was generated > from green renewable sources, instead of from coal [#3]. Adding this to the > 357.9 kWh saved by the 4 CFLs, "dirty " electricity consumption was cut by > over 2012 kWh per year. > > Coal-fired power stations emit at least 1kg of CO2 per kWh produced, meaning > CO2 emissions were reduced by at least 2012 kg. That's more than 2 tonnes. > > > ======================== > > Some coal-fired power stations emit well over 1kg of CO2 per kWh produced, > and electricity tariffs are often higher than those above. For example, > Victorians paying 17.171c/kWh for power generated from brown coal would > save $61.46 a year in the scenario above, and reduce CO2 emissions by 1.3kg > for every kWh unused or switched to green energy. > > Australia's residential electricity prices are lower than those in most > developed economies [#4], with some countries (Japan, Italy etc.) charging > more than twice as much. The potential for emissions reductions in most > countries could be consequently even higher than in the example above. > > > =================================================== > > #1: Since a CFL lasts about 6 times as long as an incandescent bulb, at > current prices the extra upfront cost of the CFLs can be ignored. It will be > recovered over their lifetime, even if you place no value on the time saved > by changing bulbs less often. > > In the example shown, the extra upfront cost of the 4 CFLs was less than > $13, and the total cost well under 6 times that of regular bulbs. ($15.98 > for two 2-packs of CFLs vs $2.99 for a 4-pack of 60W incandescents (all > Philips)). > > Some people can actually get CFLs for free under carbon trading schemes. > > #2: Based on the SEQ electricity price, which is relatively inexpensive. > NSW is the only state in Australia with a cheaper average price, and > Australia's residential electricity prices are lower than those in most > developed economies [#4]. > > Obviously, the more expensive the power, the more > you save. > > #3: http://www.originenergy.com.au/1991/Environmental-solutions > > #4: http://www.bcse.org.au/docs/MMA%20Exec%20Rep.pdf > > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<47b8985a$0$13262$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news1.optus.net.au!optus!newsfeeder.syd.optusnet.com.au!news.optusnet.com.au!not-for-mailReferences:
<47b83ec1$0$24086$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fdaee,e458e6978b6a3e5d X-Google-Thread: 10c480,e458e6978b6a3e5d X-Google-Thread: 10df0c,e458e6978b6a3e5d X-Google-Thread: f6f53,e458e6978b6a3e5d X-Google-Attributes: gidfdaee,gid10c480,gid10df0c,gidf6f53,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news1.optus.net.au!optus!newsfeeder.syd.optusnet.com.au!news.optusnet.com.au!not-for-mail Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 07:25:38 +1100 From: B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: aus.environment.conservation,aus.environment.misc,aus.politics,alt.global-warming Subject: Re: A simple, cost-free way to cut your annual household CO2 emissions by tonnes. References: <47b83ec1$0$24086$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> In-Reply-To: <47b83ec1$0$24086$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 103 Message-ID: <47b8985a$0$13262$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: 211.30.128.174 X-Trace: 1203279962 13262 211.30.128.174 X-Original-Bytes: 4916