🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: aus.environment.misc
Article #191

Re: water tank rebates

#191
From: 0tterbot
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:08
43 lines
3293 bytes
"George W. Frost" <frosty@iceworks.org> wrote in message 
news:TMiki.4794$4A1.4528@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> Nice to see the councils giving a rebate if you install rainwater tanks to 
> connect to the toilet etc, but you wait and see what the councils have 
> planned for the future.
> They will legislate and announce a    "Bulk Water Storage Tank Fee"

will they indeed?

i wonder why it is then that nobody would be able to collate how many litres 
people are storing in dams, etc; and nobody wants to, and nobody is trying 
to. a few poxy town water tanks wouldn't be worth the bother, compared to 
charging for people's stored dam water.

of course, common sense and conspiracy theories don't usually match.

> It is really odd that Connex get fined thousands of dollars  for not 
> supplying trains to schedule and missed trains etc.
> Yet, all the water Boards seem to be exempt from any fees for not 
> supplying water as needed.

what a strange thing to say. you are charged for connection & supply because 
nothing has changed - you still have connection & supply. you are charged 
the same amount of usage as usual for the water that you use. when you turn 
on the tap, water comes out (at a very cheap price), same as ever. what's 
the problem?

> We are almost on level 4 restrictions all across the state, which means 
> you cant use water as you like, yet we still have to pay top price for the 
> supply of goods which we  are not allowed to have.

nobody in australia pays "top price" for water. water is even more 
undervalued than petrol is. the price of town water will go up, for sure, 
because it's being undercharged compared to its value.

undoubtedly, when the price goes up, there will be a cacophony of whingeing 
from conspiracy theorists (and generally greedy people who think communal 
problems are supposed to be dealt with by everyone else, not them).

> Something doesn't sound quite right, it doesn't balance.

you're not wrong there, but i think you're looking at the wrong thing.
kylie 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <kjUki.5637$4A1.4008@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!lon-transit.news.telstra.net!lon-in.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mail
References: <TMiki.4794$4A1.4528@news-server.bigpond.net.au>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10c480,f7aec6abae784421
X-Google-Thread: 111148,f7aec6abae784421
X-Google-Thread: 1083c4,f7aec6abae784421
X-Google-Thread: 102c27,f7aec6abae784421
X-Google-Attributes: gid10c480,gid111148,gid1083c4,gid102c27,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!lon-transit.news.telstra.net!lon-in.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: "0tterbot" <spl@t.com>
Newsgroups: aus.environment.misc,aus.gardens,aus.general,aus.legal
References: <TMiki.4794$4A1.4528@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
Subject: Re: water tank rebates
Lines: 45
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
Message-ID: <kjUki.5637$4A1.4008@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:08:00 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 144.139.223.199
X-Complaints-To: abuse@bigpond.net.au
X-Trace: news-server.bigpond.net.au 1184108880 144.139.223.199 (Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:08:00 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:08:00 EST
Organization: BigPond Internet Services