🚀 go-pugleaf

"Flowergirl" <notreal@spamthisplease.com> wrote in message 
news:FbYki.5712$4A1.557@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> "George W. Frost" <frosty@iceworks.org> wrote in message
> news:XNWki.5684$4A1.4943@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>>
>> "0tterbot" <spl@t.com> wrote in message
>> news:kjUki.5637$4A1.4008@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
>
>> >
>> > nobody in australia pays "top price" for water. water is even more
>> > undervalued than petrol is. the price of town water will go up, for
> sure,
>> > because it's being undercharged compared to its value.
>>
>> I read and re-read this to make sure that what I saw was right.
>> What a fucking wanker you are, trying to compare water prices to petrol
>> Have you ever tried to run your car on water, or even tried to drink
> petrol?
>
> Then perhaps you'd better read it again - it makes perfect sense to me.
> However, your posts thus far seem to make quantum leaps in logic at almost
> every new sentence.
> To enlighten you, it was in response to you stating that we are paying 
> "top
> price" for water, which is not the case. Otterbot's statement very clearly
> (and correctly) says that water is an undervalued comodity in Australia 
> and
> infers that we are indeed *not* paying top price.  An analogy is drawn 
> with
> the fact that petrol is also an undervalued comodity and that water is 
> even
> more undervalued.
> Have a nice day.
> A
>
>

You obviously have some sort of affiliation with Otterbot
have a nice life together