Article View: aus.environment.misc
Article #215Re: What's wrong with geothermal?
From: Jo Schaper
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 17:44
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 17:44
90 lines
4955 bytes
4955 bytes
Peter Webb wrote: > "Addinall" <addinall@addinall.org> wrote in message > news:1167544085.362178.229360@42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com... >> Landy wrote: >>> "David Moss" <q0320811@mail.connect.usq.edu.au> wrote in message >>> news:MPG.2000942a106031ce98a258@news.bigpond.com... >>>> In article <en4jub$rl8$1@news-02.connect.com.au>, dontemailme@all.com >>>> writes... >>>> >>>>> So tell me what's wrong with this form of energy as an alternative to >>>>> coal? >>>> Isn't geothermal just another kind of nuclear energy? >>>> >>> Well yes, but one is nuclear fission and the other is not. >> Nope. Both fission. Exactly the same process the Green >> nuts get all pantieless over. What's more, it's not >> contained. >> >> Environmental Pollution in Sindh, Pakistan >> By Mrs. Farzana Panhwar >> September 2004 >> >> [...] >> >> Mass awareness and education program. >> Pollution- the contamination of air, water or soil with substance >> harmful to life -has been a seemingly inevitable by-product of >> industrialisation and urbanisation, should be reduced. >> Geothermal power brings thermal pollution of air and surface water, >> contamination ground water, increase, hydrogen sulphide and sulphuric >> oxide pollutants in the air, create problems in the disposal of salts. >> These carefully monitored and their pollutants should be controlled and >> checked at an International Standard to bring sustainable activities in >> the country. >> http://www.eco-web.com/editorial/040924.html >> >> [...] >> ------------ >> >> Of course if you pump a load of water down a hole that >> is being heated by a load of radioactive rock, some of that >> radioactive material will be dissolved or kept in supension >> in the water, and it's going to come up to the surface. >> >> It WILL also find it's way into the water table and aquifiers. >> Water is the slipperiest molecule in the universe. It >> will get everywhere once pumped into fissured >> rock. >> >> This is a big scream for the "NO NUKE" crowd, if something >> weally bad hapens, like tewwowists or a WEALLY big earthquake, >> you could leak nasty stuff into the WATER TABLE killing >> all the chilrun for at least 200,000 years. So THERE.....! >> >> Sorry to tell you kiddies, injection driven geothermal power generation >> does that from day one, week one. >> >> In a country like Australia, devising a scheme to take huge >> quantities of fresh water and polluting it to generate electricity >> is criminal. And insane. >> >> On the other hand, a closed fuel cycle reactor, metal cooled, >> will sit there and chug along producing not only power, >> but nice clean drinking water as well. >> >> Here we go. A few dozen of these little babies >> all around the coast. >> >> http://www.llnl.gov/str/JulAug04/Smith.html >> >> Plug-n-Play Power. >> >> Mark Addinall. >> >> >>> cheers >>> Bill > > That's not my understanding of geothermal energy (though I may be wrong). > > Pump salt water down one hole, and tap it as steam out the other hole. The > salt is left behind; fresh water is the waste product. Because heat exchange > (Carnot cycle) engines are so inefficient at comparatively low temperatures > (a few hundred degrees C), you actually get a lot of fresh water produced > for each kWh you produce. When the "mining" is completed, you have a huge > amount of salt from the sea buried deep underground and the other waste > product - fresh water - available for consumption. And when the underground area is clogged with salt, and you then salinify the aquifer?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<12pftnof8ae1jaa@corp.supernews.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.germany.com!news.ecp.fr!feed.ac-versailles.fr!exabot.com!freenix!sn-xt-sjc-04!sn-xt-sjc-07!sn-post-sjc-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<en4jub$rl8$1@news-02.connect.com.au> <MPG.2000942a106031ce98a258@news.bigpond.com> <en59h3$rh0$1@news-02.connect.com.au> <1167544085.362178.229360@42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com> <45975899$0$9773$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10c480,5f0137fe89979e1d X-Google-Thread: 105543,5f0137fe89979e1d X-Google-Thread: 10df0c,5f0137fe89979e1d X-Google-Thread: 104f8c,5f0137fe89979e1d X-Google-Attributes: gid10c480,gid105543,gid10df0c,gid104f8c,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit From: Jo Schaper <jospamnotschaper34@5socket78dot9net> Newsgroups: aus.environment.misc,aus.invest,aus.politics,sci.geo.geology Subject: Re: What's wrong with geothermal? Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 11:44:49 -0600 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: <12pftnof8ae1jaa@corp.supernews.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <en4jub$rl8$1@news-02.connect.com.au> <MPG.2000942a106031ce98a258@news.bigpond.com> <en59h3$rh0$1@news-02.connect.com.au> <1167544085.362178.229360@42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com> <45975899$0$9773$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> In-Reply-To: <45975899$0$9773$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Lines: 90 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.germany.com!news.ecp.fr!feed.ac-versailles.fr!exabot.com!freenix!sn-xt-sjc-04!sn-xt-sjc-07!sn-post-sjc-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail