Article View: aus.environment.misc
Article #238Re: What's wrong with geothermal?
From: Timberwoof
Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2007 18:53
Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2007 18:53
48 lines
3328 bytes
3328 bytes
In article <pISdnQ8n7-mTrwTYnZ2dnUVZ_oSnnZ2d@comcast.com>, Jim Lillie <jimlillie@comcast.net> wrote: > Timberwoof wrote: > > In article <1167544085.362178.229360@42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>, > > "Addinall" <addinall@addinall.org> wrote: > > > > > >>Of course if you pump a load of water down a hole that > >>is being heated by a load of radioactive rock, some of that > >>radioactive material will be dissolved or kept in supension > >>in the water, and it's going to come up to the surface. > > > > > > Oh. I did not know that lava coming out of volcanoes is radioactive. I'm > > sure that very few people know this. I think that even geologists don't > > know this. > > > They know. > The coal pile at a power plant may exceed the perimiter level allowed > for a nuclear plant. > The Congressional hearings after 3 Mile Island had a higher background > level in the *granite* walled hearing chamber - than the peak exposure > downwind from the 'incident'. > > Radioactive is not yes/no binary beyond the individual atom level. > What is the proportion of your sample, of what isotopes. > > Remember - sunburn is radiation damage from a fusion reactor. > TURN OFF THE SUN. > > Oooops? What other problems? > > Jim Lillie You seem to be trying to educate me in radioactivity; trust me; I know some basic things about it. (One if my favorite quizzes is this: Here's a 1kg lump of material with a half-life of five hours and there's a lump of material with a half-life of five million years. Given the choice, which one would you sit next to? Please see also my POM-nominated post on the effects of changed nuclear decay times over in talk.origins.) Never mind that everything is radioactive in the really long term; consider what Addinall meant. -- Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com> http://www.timberwoof.com It's easy to say a war is so important your neighbor should go fight it for you.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<timberwoof.spam-7D944D.10530401012007@nnrp-virt.nntp.sonic.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!news.astraweb.com!router2.astraweb.com!news-xfer.nntp.sonic.net!posts.news.sonic.net!nnrp0.nntp.sonic.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<en4jub$rl8$1@news-02.connect.com.au> <MPG.2000942a106031ce98a258@news.bigpond.com> <en59h3$rh0$1@news-02.connect.com.au> <1167544085.362178.229360@42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com> <timberwoof.spam-247F9C.11215631122006@nnrp-virt.nntp.sonic.net> <pISdnQ8n7-mTrwTYnZ2dnUVZ_oSnnZ2d@comcast.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10c480,5f0137fe89979e1d X-Google-Thread: 105543,5f0137fe89979e1d X-Google-Thread: 10df0c,5f0137fe89979e1d X-Google-Thread: 104f8c,5f0137fe89979e1d X-Google-Attributes: gid10c480,gid105543,gid10df0c,gid104f8c,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!news.astraweb.com!router2.astraweb.com!news-xfer.nntp.sonic.net!posts.news.sonic.net!nnrp0.nntp.sonic.net!not-for-mail From: Timberwoof <timberwoof.spam@infernosoft.com> Newsgroups: aus.environment.misc,aus.invest,aus.politics,sci.geo.geology Subject: Re: What's wrong with geothermal? Organization: Infernosoft References: <en4jub$rl8$1@news-02.connect.com.au> <MPG.2000942a106031ce98a258@news.bigpond.com> <en59h3$rh0$1@news-02.connect.com.au> <1167544085.362178.229360@42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com> <timberwoof.spam-247F9C.11215631122006@nnrp-virt.nntp.sonic.net> <pISdnQ8n7-mTrwTYnZ2dnUVZ_oSnnZ2d@comcast.com> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Mac OS X) Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2007 10:53:04 -0800 Message-ID: <timberwoof.spam-7D944D.10530401012007@nnrp-virt.nntp.sonic.net> Lines: 48 NNTP-Posting-Date: 01 Jan 2007 18:53:04 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: d94ef70a.news.sonic.net X-Trace: DXC=6PLk[^8SBN=SZ;1S58hVM=m4K\QM1CV^01OYf0H`?;X1[FE3if_M3J25]9WQI2kDA:Z4]j90b_Aj?2THPKZ4T:I? X-Complaints-To: abuse@sonic.net