Article View: aus.environment.misc
Article #242Re: What's wrong with geothermal?
From: Addinall
Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2007 22:55
Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2007 22:55
67 lines
4157 bytes
4157 bytes
Timberwoof wrote: > In article <pan.2007.01.01.07.09.08.180040@comcast.net>, > Phil Hays <spampostmaster@comcast.net> wrote: > > > Timberwoof wrote: > > > > > "Addinall" <addinall@addinall.org> wrote: > > > > > >> Of course if you pump a load of water down a hole that is being heated > > >> by a load of radioactive rock, some of that radioactive material will > > >> be dissolved or kept in supension in the water, and it's going to come > > >> up to the surface. > > > > > > Oh. I did not know that lava coming out of volcanoes is radioactive. I'm > > > sure that very few people know this. I think that even geologists don't > > > know this. > > > > Almost everything is radioactive, at least to some extent. I strongly > > suspect that most geologists know this. The air is radioactive because of > > C14. Our bodies are radioactive due to K40 and others. It is mostly a > > matter of degree of how radioactive things are. Most rocks are slightly > > radioactive. Some rocks are quite radioactive. A few rocks are very very > > radioactive. > > I know this. Of course you do darling, you're an elf, and elves know these things magically! > > > I don't know how radioactive the rock where the geothermal is being > > proposed is. It would be foolish not to find out what sort of radiation > > release would be generated before significant development of the > > geothermal field. However, chemical risks are probably higher: arsenic, > > lead, etc. > > Is lava typically more radioactive than, say, rocks found at some > roadcut? Which lava and which road cut would be a good start to a question. > > Consider the context: someone explained to Addinall that the Earth's > interior is heated by radioactive decay. No, Addinall deduced that from earlier works of others about 35 years ago. But do go on... > Addinall seems to have deduced > that volcanoes and geothermal hot spots are typically near deposits of > radioactive materials. (Boy, that would make mining the stuff even less > fun.) You have never worked in the geology business have you son? What is the most used assay at the moment for finding potential granite hot-spots? I can give you a hint, it has nothing to do with Dragons..... Mark Addinall. > > -- > Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com> http://www.timberwoof.com > It's easy to say a war is so important your neighbor should go fight it for you.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1167692156.328360.139710@42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<en4jub$rl8$1@news-02.connect.com.au> <MPG.2000942a106031ce98a258@news.bigpond.com> <en59h3$rh0$1@news-02.connect.com.au> <1167544085.362178.229360@42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com> <timberwoof.spam-247F9C.11215631122006@nnrp-virt.nntp.sonic.net> <pan.2007.01.01.07.09.08.180040@comcast.net> <timberwoof.spam-452A7A.10562101012007@nnrp-virt.nntp.sonic.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10c480,5f0137fe89979e1d X-Google-Thread: 105543,5f0137fe89979e1d X-Google-Thread: 10df0c,5f0137fe89979e1d X-Google-Thread: 104f8c,5f0137fe89979e1d X-Google-Attributes: gid10c480,gid105543,gid10df0c,gid104f8c,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Addinall" <addinall@addinall.org> Newsgroups: aus.environment.misc,aus.invest,aus.politics,sci.geo.geology Subject: Re: What's wrong with geothermal? Date: 1 Jan 2007 14:55:56 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 68 Message-ID: <1167692156.328360.139710@42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com> References: <en4jub$rl8$1@news-02.connect.com.au> <MPG.2000942a106031ce98a258@news.bigpond.com> <en59h3$rh0$1@news-02.connect.com.au> <1167544085.362178.229360@42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com> <timberwoof.spam-247F9C.11215631122006@nnrp-virt.nntp.sonic.net> <pan.2007.01.01.07.09.08.180040@comcast.net> <timberwoof.spam-452A7A.10562101012007@nnrp-virt.nntp.sonic.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.217.10.235 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1167692161 30041 127.0.0.1 (1 Jan 2007 22:56:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 22:56:01 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <timberwoof.spam-452A7A.10562101012007@nnrp-virt.nntp.sonic.net> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: 42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com; posting-host=203.217.10.235; posting-account=7EyAuw0AAABas6401KzF687evhcxz-SJ