Article View: aus.environment.misc
Article #2529Ozone,CFC or ULP and Methyl Benzine
From: McFly
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 1996 00:00
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 1996 00:00
91 lines
4922 bytes
4922 bytes
Well I have received your angry letters (A fine example below) So your pissed off I do not like gaseous substances any more than anybody else BUT I deeply despise anyone who would support thinly veiled theories to disguise a Multi national Corporation who has a past record of enviro blackmale and Invented this gas in the first place All science is subjective to rexamination without notice anybody who does not agree does not belong Question,Question,Question and Question again Pull apart turn over and debunk, P.S. Why is it that when I mention An American Corporation the subject is somehow totally excluded from all respondants from America ,home truth perhaps So I respond to the last mailer thus I seriously think you people beleive we live in a fucking bell jar Open your eyes fool This theory and that is what it will remain is based on such a high improbability due to it simply being environmental and if you cant even predict the weather for the next day with any degree of regularity the only thing about the weather that is statistically predictable is that all weather information will be unilaterally inaccurate least of all bell jar type experiments that prove nothing conclusive about the environment statistical analists laugh at people like you. And still out of all this crap I receive not one of you has attempted to explain the Dupont factor and how they established a company to sell us this so called wonder gas called the westinghouse refrigerator company And HOW that Lil ol fridge company aquired the capitol to build all of those lovely Nuke plants. And why two scientists whom were supported by Dupont funded Caltech received no less than a Nobel Prize for this wonderfull theory Protocols passed in record time. It already smells like a dog turd reminding me of there little Nylon V Hemp scandle ,The scum always floats to the top no matter how much you stir it . now thats science. ---------- > From: james phillips <jamarno@juno.com> > To: dbrimage@ozemail.com.au > Subject: Ozone and Freon > Date: Saturday, 21 September 1996 11:42 > > Sorry, Mr. Damage, but the oceans do not produce much ozone, and even if > they did, it wouldn't help the ozone layer because the molecules are > highly reactive and break down in the lower atmosphere in about 13 > seconds each. The only reason there's a significant amount of ozone in > the stratosphere is because the air is so thin that there aren't many > other molecules to destroy ozone. > > CFCs are unusual because they last a long time and they don't dissolve in > water. That's why they damage the ozone layer - they last long enough to > diffuse up into the stratosphere and aren't washed out of the air by > rain. > The evidence is quite solid that CFCs are responsible for most of the > ozone layer damage, and scientists in the field are quite aware of > factors such as varying wind conditions, changes in solar output, > volcanic emissions, etc., and they actually consider well over a hundred > different factors and have looked very hard to find other sources of > chlorine that reached the statosphere and other places where CFCs could > be stored or destroyed in the environment. > > Now, I'm not an environmental extremist who thinks barbeque starter fluid > should be outlawed or we should panic over global warming (I don't > believe there's sufficient proof of it). See no mention of the doer of the Evil You see if we pointed the bone directly at Dupont then everybody would have been running to the gates enmass to tell them to pay for the cleanup but it didn't happen that way did it. moving right along Ok now where finished with the crap I have a serious environmental concern Carcenogenes in petrol Unleaded is bad news All they replaced the tetra etyhl lead with is more methyl benzine its a great trick we use it at the race track to raise the octane to about 115 without avgas or alchohol alchohol is banned so we put methyl benz in (toluene) to be exact , the densitometer cant pick up the benz so we fool the scrutineers anyway thats all the gov and petrol companies did to us Problem: methyl benz gives you a rather nasty case of Accute myaloid leukemia service station attendants in sweden were droping off like flies. Soluton: Self Serve Moral of this entire story is "Keep Your Eyes On The Ball and Not The Wall" The End .
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<01bba7cb$85ac93a0$LocalHost@bob>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10c480,13aa2e3c2e764ced,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10c480,public X-Google-Thread: fb58e,13aa2e3c2e764ced,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfb58e,public From: "McFly" <dbrimage@ozemail.com.au> Subject: Ozone,CFC or ULP and Methyl Benzine Date: 1996/09/21 Message-ID: <01bba7cb$85ac93a0$LocalHost@bob> X-Deja-AN: 184448507 organization: OzEmail Ltd - Australia newsgroups: aus.environment.misc,talk.environment