Article View: aus.environment.misc
Article #2641South Seas Report
From: Jonathan Sumby
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 1996 00:00
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 1996 00:00
252 lines
13951 bytes
13951 bytes
The South Seas A Brief Report Jon Sumby, Jan-Feb 1996 (Published in the Sea Shepherd Log 1st Quarter 1996, with photos) South Pacific Australia is one part of an international trade in seahorses. Dried and ground to powder, seashorses are a valuable part of the Asian natural medicine and aphrodisiac trade. The trade in seahorses and seadragons for the international aquarium trade is booming. Already some Australian populations may be under threat, with a leafy seadragon from Western Australia recently sold in Hong Kong for a reported AUS$13,000. The Commonwealth Wildlife Protection Act, which controls trade in native species, specifically exempts marine fish from protection. However in 1994 the Commonwealth tried to get all seahorse species protected, being opposed by the State and Commonwealth fisheries ministers concerned that trade might suffer if restrictions were put in place. This year the Australian Nature Conservation Agency is reviewing the situation with the view to placing seahorses and other syngnathids under the protection of the Act. Seahorses and pipefish are also being taken in numbers from the Galapagos Islands, sought by the same dealers buying seal penis to market as an aphrodisiac TING HONG EXPANDING IN SOUTH PACIFIC. Ting Hong Oceanic, a Taiwanese fishing company is moving into longline fishing with dozens of boats and its own portable processing factory. The floating factory barge has its own power and only needs a fresh water hookup to operate. The factory is used to prepare tuna for the fresh sashimi trade in Japan. The fish are cleaned, graded and packed to be airfrieghted fresh to the market. Ting Hong has its own Boeing 727 to use as fish transport, flying via Guam to Japan. The barge is currently in Honiara, Solomon Islands. Ting Hong was the first Taiwanese fishing operation to be granted a licence to fish waters around the Solomon's, with a fleet of 100 fishing boats. However, the current Governement in the Solomon's is concerned that the fleet is not an economic benefit to the islands and that no jobs are provided for Islanders. Currently, no Ting Hong boat is fishing in the Solomon Islands as none has passed ship survey requirements and it is possible that they will move on. Ting Hong is possibly the single biggest fishing operation in the South Pacific. Their presence worries locals as Ting Hong is only after the money and work the cheapest operation possible. By contracting Chinese boats by the hundred to do the fishing and having a portable factory, Ting Hong can raid fishing areas and move on. Ting Hong has already moved through Micoresia and the Marshall Islands and is now in the Solomon's With crews said to only be getting paid AUS$30 a month, Ting Hong can apparently operate at 50% of the breakeven value of local industry and still make a profit. There have also been allegations of political interference bringing concessions to the company that are of little benefit to the islands. By avoiding state laws and agreements, profit is boosted and Ting Hong was recently fined US$2.2 million by the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM). Ting Hong was involved in transhipping catch at sea (so avoiding royalty payments to the FSM) and not maintaining proper catch records. Other Ting Hong boats were found guilty of illegally transhipping and fishing for reef fish in at least 20 seperate incidents. Reef fish are a highly valued commodity and are fished by hand with hook and line or cyanide, with disastrous results for the reefs ecology and local livelihoods. The fish are then flown out live to markets in Hong Kong and elsewhere. Industrial fishing operations such as Ting Hong, are considered by Pacific national fisheries to be a threat to their livelihood and by government and other groups to be poor value for local communities and for the future. However, many of these island nations are not in an economic position to refuse access and political interests can also play a role. These nations also struggle to adequately police their fisheries. When the industry is operating at the cheapest level the temptation to fish illegally is strong. Monitoring bycatch rates and species composition as well as impact on the target fish, is also a difficulty. Along with tuna, the South Pacific nations could be losing more than they know. Papua New Guinea has declared it will no longer licence domestic fishing rights to foreign companies. Domestic fishing is fishing within 12 nautical miles of the coast. Local industry is being encouraged with a Government commitment to invest up to AUS$9 million this year in the industry. It is estimated that one local boat brings in more export revenue than all the 129 foreign boat yearly licence fees put together, as well as providing local jobs. Southern Ocean ALBATROSS The Australian Government has announced a major iniative to encourage Albatross conservation. Over the next four years $AUS 1.13 million will be used to develop a Recovery Plan for the Macquarie Island population of the Wandering Albatross, declared endangered by the Australian Government last year. A "Threat Abatement Plan" designed to reduce albatross bycatch will also be developed. These iniatives will only apply to longline boats operating in Australian waters and does not apply to international fleets working beyond the Australian 200 mile limit. The Environment Minister, Senator Faulkner, said that the Federal Labor Government will "vigorously pursue the protection of albatrosses in all relevant international fora including global environmental conventions". Australia will be pressing for the nomination of all albatross species under the Bonn Convention. Once listed, global protection measures must be put in place. Two of South Korea's largest distant-water fishing companies are reported to be preparing to move into the southern bluefin tuna longline fishery. Though not confirmed, such a move would raise the bycatch rate of albatross and increase the rate of their decline. SEA FISH EXTINCTION The spotted handfish, an unusual marine fish that 'walks' along the seabed on its fins is on the verge of extinction, according to Australian fisheries scientists. The small fish with its distinctive yellow markings and fins was very common in its particular habitat but now, within the last decade, it has almost vanished . Only four sightings have been made in the last five years. The spotted handfish is restricted to the Derwent estuary and a few locations along the adjacent coastline. Freshwater fish species have been destroyed completely and marine fish populations have crashed due to human pressure but if the spotted handfish goes it will be the first marine fish to be made extinct in human history. The cause of the decline of the fish is thought to be the introduction of the north Pacific seastar, brought over in the ballast of Japanese woodchip ships or possibly US naval vessels. The handfish only lays and guards a few large eggs in a seabed nest, but it has no defences against the predatory seastar. In Australia, the issue of dumping of ships ballast water is gaining increasing attention, being described as a major threat to biodiversity and the biggest problem after oil spills. The effects of species released by the discharge of ballast water increase with time and are irreversible. Introduced species can alter entire ecosystems and habitats, causing the extinction of indigenous species. During 1992, at least 121 million tonnes of ballast water arrived in Australia from 53 countries, with most of the water entering on bulk carriers. Worldwide over 120 species of fish have been introduced to new habitats along with many species of shellfish and seaweeds. Among these are the American jacknife clam to Germany, the pacific oyster to the Meditteranean, the Eurasian ruffe fish and the zebra mussel to the Great Lakes (US). The introduction of the zebra clam to the Great Lakes ecosystem is estimated to cost the United States and Canada about US$5 billion by the 2000. In Australia, four species of fish have arrived, at least four species of toxic algae and ten species of invertebrates, including the predatory Northern Pacific Seastar, and one kelp species. Fish diseases are a concern as is the possibility of human disease such as cholera, which has been detected in ballast water, but the testing of water arriving in Australia has had no positive results so far. Australia is the fifth biggest user of shipping in the world and introduced species pose a real threat to domestic fisheries, public health and native ecosystems. Sterilisation of ballast water is one option and current research is looking into biocides, ozone, UV, heat treatment and chemically removing oxygen from ballast water. NEW SUB-ANTARCTIC FISHERY Last years exploratory fishing off the sub-antarctic Macquarie Island yielded rich catches of Patagonian Toothfish, which is similar to cod and can grow to two metres (six feet). As deep sea fisheries around Australia decline, the industry is looking further afield and the catches around Macquarie, with the frozen Toothfish selling for AUS$40 per kilogram on the Japanese fish market, is creating intense interest. Commercial fishing around Macquarie Island has begun, to the concern of Australian Antarctic scientists. A permit has also been issued for an exploratory fishing trip around Heard Island. The ship concerned, the 85 metre Austral Leader, will head for Heard Island early this year. It will fish just beyond the three mile limit, as it did around Macquarie Island. If results are good it could lead to the development of an Australian distant-water fleet. Heard and Macquarie Islands are being currently considered for World Heritage listing because of the vibrant seal and seabird colonies both islands support. To date there has never been any fisheries survey at either island to gauge the vulnerability or sustainability of the Patagonian Toothfish population. A fishery around these islands could have major impacts on the populations of seals and seabirds living there. The fishing operations will also be a direct threat to seabirds who can get caught up in fishing gear. This is a concern as the Australian Government has listed the Macquarie Island subspecies of the wandering albatross as endangered, with only ten breeding pairs to be found each year. During the first season of fishing, monitoring of the impact of the trawlers operation on the albatross population found that they were severely disrupted by the fishery. However, one trawler can bring in 350 tonnes of toothfish worth almost AUS$1.4 million, so permits will still be issued under "strict conditions" according to the Australian Fisheries Management Authority. AUSTRALIA-JAPAN WHALE SURVEY For the first time in years, Japanese whalers arrived in an Australian port. The Shonan Maru and the Shonan Maru II were berthed in Hobart for a week in January, before heading for the Ross Sea to survey Minke. Earlier, the two ships had been out in the Great Australian Bight searching for blue whales, under the control of Mr. John Bannister who is associated with the University of Western Australia. The survey was part of work to establish the abundance of "true" blue whales. The survey was conducted under the banner of the IWC in support of the Southern Ocean Sanctuary. Mr Bannister said that the research was an initial sighting survey to learn how to identify the two blue whale types and to take biopsies for genetic studies. Further research will concentrate on getting population estimates. According to Mr. Bannister, there are thought to be less than a thousand "true" blue whales, and about 6000 "pygmy" blue whales. The "pygmy" blue was identified in 1960 by Tadayoshi Ichihara and is said to be confined to waters around Kerguelen and Crozet Islands in the southern Indian Ocean. In the three years immediately following the discovery, the Japanese whaling industry killed 2,450 "pygmy" blue whales. The pygmy blue whale, as Balaenoptera musculus brevicauda, is still not fully accepted as a subspecies. Field identification is then a problem as the "pygmy" blue is said to have a shorter tail, be slightly heavier in the body and more silvery in colour than the "true" blue. Blue whale colouration varies with age, and assesing tail and body size ratios of a diving whale from the deck of a heaving whaler may nothing more than hit or miss. The risk of such research is that it could give the Japanese whaling industry two platforms to argue for increased kills. One, that the blue is not a growing population and that the Minke is outcompeting them for food and so needs to be "culled". The other is that the "true" blue is at risk but that the "pygmy" is abundant enough to sustain a catch quota. However, Mr. Bannister dismisses these ideas for two reasons. First, the "pygmy" blue is abundant only in relation to the "true" blue not in terms of original populations. Secondly, he says the idea that Minke are taking over the blue whale niche and outcompeting them for krill has little sway with ecologists. It is considered unlikely as both Humpback and Southern Right whale populations are increasing in the face of competition from Minke whales.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<nonni.830825052@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10c480,4dabc6a67fe3209c,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10c480,public From: nonni@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU (Jonathan Sumby) Subject: South Seas Report Date: 1996/04/30 Message-ID: <nonni.830825052@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au> X-Deja-AN: 152135703 organization: The University of Melbourne newsgroups: aus.environment.misc