🚀 go-pugleaf

On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 10:23:28 +0900, "netvegetable"
<netvegetableN0T@dodo.com.au> wrote:

>On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 17:31:35 +0000, Eunometic wrote:
>
>> "netvegetable" <netvegetableN0T@dodo.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:<pan.2004.10.05.08.44.49.79398@dodo.com.au>...
>>> Here is an industry that employs less than 6000 people in Tasmania.
>> 
>> 
>> Yeah, lets use concrete, steel, aluminium and other net greenhouse gas
>> producers instead of wood.
>> 
>No fuck that. Let's just use plantation timber. The overwhelming majority
>of logging in Tas is done in plantations ... And given that only 7000
>people are employed in that industry (according to the abs) it's only a
>tiny minority of people who are threatened by the proposed moratorium on
>oldgrowth areas.
>

Look here you hippy.
If they cut down the trees then there wont be anymore trees and thatll
be the end of the loggers.
But if your wrong then that wont be the end of loggers will it becuase
there wil still be trees for them to cut down.
And if there are still trees for them to cut down in future, then
whats your frgiin problem.
End of story.

>> 
>>> These are people who made a choice to become stooges for an unviable
>>> industry, .
>> 
>> What does old growth forrest mean?  I.E it has NEVER been logged or it
>> does it mean it hasn't been logged for 20 years and is re-established?
>> 
>It means there are trees hundreds of years old in the Styx valley and
>Tarkine. They are the tallest hardwood trees in the world. Whole
>ecosystems have developed around them.

Yeah eco nomic systems

>
>>> help demolish a World Heritage value site and reduce it to toilet paper
>> 
>> In other words it is not world herritage site but is considered in your
>> opinion to be world herritage value?
>
>And the opinion of the IUNC, and the Australian Heritage Commission. 

Both full of leftist hippies and lefty green opinions.

>And
>the opinion of pretty much every authority 

Crap, its limited to your greeny pals.