Thread View: aus.environment.misc
2 messages
2 total messages
Started by nought
Thu, 20 Jan 2011 02:33
Brisbane Flood
Author: nought
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 02:33
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 02:33
3 lines
1085 bytes
1085 bytes
A perspective on the recent Brisbane Flood Disaster. http://pragmocracy.wordpress.com/2011/01/18/the-sinking-of-the-wivenhoe-doctrine/
Re: Brisbane Flood
Author: gardenlen
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 20:09
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 20:09
108 lines
6430 bytes
6430 bytes
having also lived through 74, much of what is said on your link is true, that being the gov's and councils told residents as flood mitigation work was carried out, i lived at graceville and that house again got flooded not over the roof like 74 but about 1/3 up the walls. they also consgtructed a mini flood plain between the rocklea markets and corinda, lots would drive over the culvert and take no notice. the problem goes way back to when they built the research stgation, the rocklea markets and parts of salisbury over the pamphlet creek. you see it wasn't until 74 that thos whiz kid agronomist's whatever one might call them realised that teh pamphlet creek part of the oxley creek system did not empty into teh brisbane river right there where les thiess's daughter lives/lived, not excess water from the brisbane river by design of nature flowed into that creek and thence into the swampy flood lands where much of salisbury now is, then though the natural system to renter the river furtehr downstream. so the flood issue was helped along way back then. remember somerset also a flood mitigation dam was built in the early 1900 i dunno now wasn't there about the 1920's maybe, it too was touted as stopping brisbane (built on flood plains and swamps from ever flooding again, so the gov and their sciences backup have gotten it wrong twice now. as the mitigation work was carried out mostly in the oxley creek environ when that was finished they all lauded how app' 3 meters had been knocked off the top of 74 flood. the creek work was to stabalise and clean creek banks using cages filled with rocks, de-sludge the creek system, remove all sort of garbage including car bodies, reclaimed and compensated people to leave their homes on the flood plains (silly allowing any building on flood plains hey but why waste good ratable land). and when wivenhoe was finished they yelled we have chopped 8 meters off the 74 flood it will never flood again. we where living there while all this postulating went on, then they built teh flood saver to great wivenhoe flood mitigation dam (nothing to do with water storage) a dam that ended up now get this 190% full i mean when was there more than 100% in 100%?? anyhow our city leaders and state and fed gov all pronounced with much banter "no no never agin will ipswich or brisbane flood" so they opened up all thatg reclaimed flood plain to be built on after all teh council needed ratable land, the gov needed to earn land taxes, and the gullable yuppy classes jsut had to have river frontage. direcvtly i don't blasm the button pushers they are the lowest common denominator in all this, i blame the gov and councils sorry for having such inept regulations for these workers to follow, but also the head honcho should have shown some common sense in the whole issue instead of shutting the gates early to stop the stupid wow factorers hell bent on seeing water flow from flood gagtes, and the ensuing traffic issues attached to that folly. yes the house we lived in went completely under in 74 we weren't there of course we came 10 or so years later and the house stunk of flood mud you see in 74 they didn't strip walls from houses they didn't rewire homes, like this time around. the bloke who bought the place found all the mud when he pulled out walls to reneovate the place, which realy should ahve been demolished back then it was only 3 ex-wacol army huts joined together. never meant for permanent accomodation. but that's another story the place burnt down due to the main power feed wire from the pole through the ceiling to the power box. humans need to wise up stop building on flood plains and swamps and wetlands, buyer beware be warned stop buying those places and they will stop building them. the gov is squarely to blame and no dam even somerset should ever be allowed to go over 100%, somerset went to 160% i believe, the carrying capacity of the dam should be honestly known at all time. the ace up the sleave of lying politicians won't work as we just experienced. will it happen again you bet your tukely it will, as the people are too naive and gullable, so the gov' gets away with bad policy. i mean our leader even seemd to be proclaiming she broke the drought in qld as the wivenhoe had reached 90something% full. On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:33:12 +1000, nought <nought@nought.com> wrote: >A perspective on the recent Brisbane Flood Disaster. > >http://pragmocracy.wordpress.com/2011/01/18/the-sinking-of-the-wivenhoe-doctrine/ -- Matthew 25:13 KJV "Watch therefore, for ye know neither the day nor the hour wherein the Son of man cometh" Mark 13:33 "Take ye heed, watch and pray: for ye know not when the time is". and also: Isaiah 38:1&17-18 KJV 1: Thus saith the Lord, set thine house in order: for thou shalt die and not live. 17: for thou hast cast all my sins behind my back. 18: For the grave cannot praise thee, death cannot celebrate thee: they that go down in the pit cannot hope for truth. len With peace and brightest of blessings, "Seek truth and understanding will follow" http://www.lensgarden.com.au/
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads