🚀 go-pugleaf

  Hello...
  This question has a lot to it, and sorry if it's a bit long.  I'll
explain why, first off...
  Since I was 15 I wanted to learn to be a mathematician.  But here in
SW Kansas, there isn't much in the way of that kind of thing, as so I
thought.  Actually, I didn't even know there were mathematicians until
I was 25 to 28...Whenever the show Medium started, for that's how I
heard of them still existing.  Which ironically enough if it wasn't
for my wife who loves watching TV I would have never known.
   Anyway, I had always been embarrassed to tell people about wanting
to learn mathematics, and actually not knowing anything about it, I
had done things in my own way.  So the question is basically where do
I start on these kind of things...
   The first is numerical systems verses numerical sequences....
   I have three forms of numerical formats, depending on the fonts I
can use here, I don't know if I can show them appropriately.
  Ax^p+-B  This is a common form which is easily seen in polynomials.
I know I am a late bloomer, and still have a long ways to go in
understanding these things, I have become aware that any number in any
numerical system, which I have studied the Classical and Modern Mayan
numerical systems and of course the Decimal system, can have multiple
numerical systems within each sequence.  A sequence is the number
represented by the numerical system.
   Example, (3x+4)(x-5)  The two numerical systems here are -4/3 and
5, these forms show the Decimal number 20 or the Mayan number 1,0. (1
representing the base 20 and 0 representing 20^0).
   The second formula is just a simple example of a numerical system,
it is not a formula of real numbers, but of an idea of numbers.
   Nx^p+-i, N represents the number at the place value, x represents
the base, and p represents the place value and i represents the
incremental value.

   The third formula is very intricate and I wouldn't even try to put
it in characters in this form of text.  It is difficult for the
numerical systems in which it represents can not be shown as easily as
Decimal or Vegesimal, vigesimal...Which ever spelling...

   I call this formula K, which is not the English letter K but the
Cherokee letter which sounds like joe where the oe is nasalized and
the end of the word sounds like the nt in joint, with a strongly
glottalized sound which the t is not pronounced.  It is also the
Cherokee word for 'Three'.
   There are three kinds of numerical systems in which I have been
looking at.
   Perfect, such as Decimal, Vigesimal, etc
   Inflected, such as how we tell time from Year, Month, Day, Hour,
Minute, Second, Millisecond, etc.
   Equational, which each place value is set up in an equation format.
   The equational numerical system which I had created on my own is
based on 4 but only starts at 1, however, the numerical system always
returns to 0.
   +1+1-1-1
   +1+1-1-2
   +1+1-1-3
   +1+1-1-4
   +1+1-2-1
   And so on and so forth.
   These may look like they are four place values, but they are a
single place value.  The number which is represented by the equation
+1+1-2-1 is actually the number 4, or the fourth number from zero.

   Well, that is the part about numerical systems, and if you happen
to know anyone who has written about such things, please tell me the
name of the book.  There are lots of things I have written about
numerical systems, and much more information about them than that.
But I am still trying to figure out a better way of defining them,
though.

   The next part has to do with such equations as -a(-y), sorry to
say, that this is NOT multiplication, this is an inverse...I have
tried my darnest to believe that it is OK to use -a(-y) to mean ay,
but I just can't.  In all my understanding it works as this...
    +a(+b)  is incrementive, meaning that a increments b times, or b
increments a times.
    This is NEVER inversive.
    +a(-b) or -a(+b) is again, inversive, it is never incrementive.
    Lets say we have +6(-5) which we know to equal -30, but if we
write this out in the format of incrementation then it does not equal
-30.
    +6-6-6-6-6.  How can a positive number exist in the negative?
    -a(-b) again, is only inversive, it can never be incrementive.
    -6(-5)
   -6--6--6--6--6, how can we start at any number and come out with
30?
   -5--5--5--5--5--5
   Which, of course, brought me to think that our idea of numbers is
extremely false.  There is no such thing as negative, and that this is
only a way for us to come to grasp reality.
    And thinking along that line, zero is nonexistant, also.  So
therefore, the cartesian plane is a lie *to be blunt*.
    I had been wondering about reality, and figuring that there is no
such thing as negative matter, so therefore all matter is positive, if
viewed as a numeral.  Therefore, if zero does exist it would have to
do with the void that exists between matter.  But, however, I do not
think this is appropriate.

    The last one which I have recently thought of is extremely
complex, and I have no idea exactly how to write about it where it can
be understood easily, without a whiteboard or chalkboard to express it
better...But I'll try...

   I'm not sure where this one belongs, physics, whatever, but that's
why I'm writing these things down trying to figure out where to
start...

   R<sub>p(x)  The <sub> representing a subscript caracter.
   This is what I call a recursive function, it is what I have been
wondering about defining existance. Not being created, but just
existing.
   I haven't seen anything written about the life span of atoms or
particals, let alone if they believe them to be created somewhere, so
I don't really bother with that kind of thing until I learn of it.
   But the recursive function is as it states, it is a function which
falls back onto itself.  And it has nothing to do with x alone, x is
only a small part.

   Think of a bowl of Cherioes.  Lets say there is a Cherio that is
painted red on one side, and has a line which is pointing directly
east.
   We move our spoon through the bowl which upsets the layout of the
Cherioes.  They move.
   Our Cherio moves with the rest.  Because of the bowl being filled,
that Cherio causes another one to move, as well as itself is moved.
   So, that Cherio causes a change, but however, if we keep stirring
sooner or later that Cherio is going to return to its place that it
began, therefore, starting anew.
   Now, the Recursive function does not work here yet.  What I have
stated is the Cherio returning to its place.  The recursive function
states that all Cherioes return to their beginning states, but it does
not have to be the same Cherioes either...
   Lets say we have a bowl the size of our solar system, and a spoon
the size of the sun.  And, also, lets say that the Cherioes do not
always exist, we do eat them.  But lets also say that the Cherioes are
replaced by new Cherioes.
   How many different kinds of Cherioes can there possibly be?  Well,
that is a simple idea, and can be understood fairly simply.  But the
Recursive function is now being applied.  For now every Cherio is
causing change to every other Cherio, until all Cherioes return to
their origin.
   Although, the original Cherioes are gone, the new ones have the
same mass, velocity, width, and height as the originals.  So the new
bowl we have is a carbon copy of the original.
   The Recursive function now has returned to zero, which just means
it has returned to the beginning.
   This is how I have viewed the Universe for the past year, and only
recently come up with a recursive idea, and am not sure where else to
go with this...

   I'm sure I have a long LOONG way to go yet...I'm now 33, and I
think I may have chronic pain, or something that is making it really
hard to concentrate on things, and think at the same time...My dad has
parkinsons, so who knows...Can't afford a doctor, so I'm just trying
to get everything done that I had started years ago...

   Anyhoo...At least I'm not afraid to tell people what I would like
to do with my life now...But unfortunately I've wasted so much time
that I think I'll never be able to make it...But eh...If You never Try
You'll Never Know, as I always say..

   Wado, Kolaval, Takk, Thanks