Article View: aus.net.access
Article #131202Re: Shame Telstra Shame
From: Greg Price
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 1995 00:00
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 1995 00:00
18 lines
1364 bytes
1364 bytes
>He also stated categorically that bulletin boards were not the specific >target of the revised charges and that it was more a "tariff correction" >applied to all lines which impose a more significant load than average on >the PSTN. Some arguments which could be used: * Most BBS access is done off peak - the PSTN is only stressed in business hours. * Is the extra money charged going from private to business rates really going to have any significant effect on telstras ability to provide the service. * In the age of digital switches and fiber between exchanges are 60 minute calls a real problem? * Attempt to find a sympathetic ear in the media, prefereably press and TV Good luck Greg
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4bfae6$eda@helotrix.defcen.GOV.AU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<DJFusw.Dv4@sleeper.apana.org.au> <DJqLrp.HvJ@asstdc.scgt.oz.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 112213,b1ba66070b274875 X-Google-Attributes: gid112213,public X-Google-Thread: fa7f6,b1ba66070b274875 X-Google-Attributes: gidfa7f6,public X-Google-Thread: 109f97,b1ba66070b274875 X-Google-Attributes: gid109f97,public From: greg@defcen.GOV.AU (Greg Price) Subject: Re: Shame Telstra Shame Date: 1995/12/23 Message-ID: <4bfae6$eda@helotrix.defcen.GOV.AU> X-Deja-AN: 122560907 distribution: aus references: <DJFusw.Dv4@sleeper.apana.org.au> <DJqLrp.HvJ@asstdc.scgt.oz.au> organization: Defence Central - Canberra, Australia. newsgroups: aus.net.access,aus.net.news,aus.org.efa