🚀 go-pugleaf

On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 15:53:59 +1000, Duffman wrote:

> netvegetable wrote:
>> On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:32:20 +1000, Duffman wrote:
>> 
>>> Such a thing will never work, long term.
>>>
>>> It would be like having the ISP virus scan your Email for you. Are you
>>> safe, Do you trust them ?
>>>
>>> People do think they are safer with these ISP's and therefore don't
>>> even bother with their own Email Virus Scanner. In reality there are so
>>> many ways to get a virus, and these people are usually the worst for
>>> getting Virus's and not recognizing a Internet Scam when they see one.
>>>
>>>
>>> Even existing Commercial programs can not stop 100% of material because
>>> other programmers are trying out smart them.
>> 
>> I'd have thought such a plan would require a complete 100% database of
>> all pr0n sites out there, constantly being update. Not possible.
>> 
>> And if, as stated in the article, it blocks IP addies instead of
>> hostnames, innocent sites will get censored.
>> 
>> 
> I have my own DNS blocking utility, I update it weekly and contains about
> 500,000 hostnames. It catches all the spyware crap and most of the really
> bad annoying shit. But stopping it all, impossible.

I wonder if the next step by pr0n merchants might be to register about a
dozen different hostnames for all of their multiple sites. That might fuck
the censors over.

-- 
A: Top posters
Q: What's the most annoying thing on usenet

"Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are 
conservatives." - John Stuart Mill