🚀 go-pugleaf

Some already do.


"netvegetable" <dontemailme@all.com> wrote in message news:e1ls1u$3kp$1@emma.aioe.org...
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 15:53:59 +1000, Duffman wrote:
>
>> netvegetable wrote:
>>> On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:32:20 +1000, Duffman wrote:
>>>
>>>> Such a thing will never work, long term.
>>>>
>>>> It would be like having the ISP virus scan your Email for you. Are you
>>>> safe, Do you trust them ?
>>>>
>>>> People do think they are safer with these ISP's and therefore don't
>>>> even bother with their own Email Virus Scanner. In reality there are so
>>>> many ways to get a virus, and these people are usually the worst for
>>>> getting Virus's and not recognizing a Internet Scam when they see one.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Even existing Commercial programs can not stop 100% of material because
>>>> other programmers are trying out smart them.
>>>
>>> I'd have thought such a plan would require a complete 100% database of
>>> all pr0n sites out there, constantly being update. Not possible.
>>>
>>> And if, as stated in the article, it blocks IP addies instead of
>>> hostnames, innocent sites will get censored.
>>>
>>>
>> I have my own DNS blocking utility, I update it weekly and contains about
>> 500,000 hostnames. It catches all the spyware crap and most of the really
>> bad annoying shit. But stopping it all, impossible.
>
> I wonder if the next step by pr0n merchants might be to register about a
> dozen different hostnames for all of their multiple sites. That might fuck
> the censors over.
>
> -- 
> A: Top posters
> Q: What's the most annoying thing on usenet
>
> "Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are
> conservatives." - John Stuart Mill
>