🚀 go-pugleaf

WTF has this shit got to do with Aus cars ?
Note Aus cars deleted

Kwyjibo wrote:
> George W Frost wrote:
>> "Kwyjibo" <kwyjibo@ozdebate.remove.com> wrote in message
>> news:jrmdnXta9_XcGR_UnZ2dnUVZ8j6dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
>>> Doug Jewell wrote:
>>>> mmal380vrx@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>> i dont know why everyone is so against it i guess people who are
>>>>> against it are into kiddy porn or other types of dirty stuff on the
>>>>> internet
>>>> If it was only about kiddy porn then I'd possibly support it
>>>> too,
>>> I wouldn't.
>>> If they have a know list of kiddie-porn sites that they are going to
>>> block, why not allow them to be accessed *BUT MONITOR WHO DOES SO* in
>>> order to gather evidence for prosecution? One the monitoring raises
>>> a flag the cops get a warrant to confiscate the user's PC for
>>> examination. Getting these sick fucks off the street is more effective 
>>> than
>>> blocking one means of accessing their sick material and forcing them
>>> underground. --
>>> Kwyj.
>>>
>> Sounds good in theory, but it would bring about legal nightmares, with
>> claims of entrapment etc, which I don't think there are laws like
>> that in OZ,
> 
> Correct. There are no laws regarding entrapment here. Even if there were, 
> they wouldn't apply unless the police emailed people a link to a kiddie porn 
> site, inviting people to view it.
> Simply allowing perverts to give in to their sick desires by themselves is 
> not even close to entrapment.
> 
>> but it would open up a lot, seeing that there has been
>> claims of judges, magistrates, coppers, priests, bishops, company
>> managers, etc. all having child porn charges against them, one of
>> them would devise a way out
> 
> It would just be another method for gathering evidence. Not much that can be 
> done to devise your way out of that.
> 
>> I seem to recall that it has been announced a while ago, that the
>> coppers already monitor known sites to bring about charges against
>> contributors of those sites
> 
> So how is that different to what I suggested?
> 
>> That seems to be the only way the coppers can apprehend them, apart
>> from word of mouth.
>