🚀 go-pugleaf

"Cerberus" <styx.sentinel.PAY@FERRYMAN.gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:Xns9BBBBAB148C0ENoneShallPass@127.0.0.1...
> "-=Spudley=-" <-=Spudley=-@home.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> "]v[etaphoid" <met@phoidpr.com> wrote in message
>> news:49a1bd87$0$3253$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>
>>> "-=Spudley=-" <-=Spudley=-@home.com> wrote in message
>>> news:IwSdl.13287$cu.2278@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>>>>
>>>> "Je�us" <none@the_moment.org> wrote in message
>>>> news:gl863p$gk2$5@news.tornevall.net...
>
>>>>> I wonder where Lazz Bin Laden is now?
>>>>
>>>> He's still with Optus and a regular on a private new Group, but
>>>> the number of adversaries he has have been reduced to one and
>>>> surprisingly it isn't me. :)
>>>
>>> Aye, it certainly is surprising - most notably, that you understand
>>> what a big word like "adversary" means.
>>>
>>> Well done Steve - the adult ed day classes appear to be finally
>>> paying dividends...
>>
>> Those football groups must be a lonely place for the likes of a
>> lonely juvenile mind like yours, that now finds it necessary to
>> rummage through old posts and almost defunct groups in hope of
>> discourse. It's too bad you can't turn yourself to more meaningful
>> pursuits.
>
> And yet still you managed a response in under 4 hours, well done Spuddles
> you certainly are consistent. It's great to see that some things don't
> change. Indeed one could profer the observation that you demonstrate the
> absolute antipathy of change; everything is rusted firmly in place!
>

Your response time of under 6.5 hours must be the accepted norm in the minor 
circles in which your move, cupcake.
Incredible how pithy it is the notice you take of how long it takes someone 
to come and reply to a group that hasn't been visited BY ME for at least a 
month.

BTW.
Did you mean to write 'proffer' as opposed to "profer" with your ramblings 
in vying for attention there, cupcake?

> -- 
> Cerberus
>
> None Shall Pass!