🚀 go-pugleaf

On Thu, 22 May 2008 15:15:10 GMT, "-=Spudley=-" <-=Spudley=-@work.com>
wrote:

>Andy wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 May 2008 07:28:49 GMT, "-=Spudley=-" <-=Spudley=-@work.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Cerberus wrote:
>>>> "-=Spudley=-" <-=Spudley=-@work.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Cerberus wrote:
>>>>>> Andy <ask_for_email@here.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 14 May 2008 01:44:21 GMT, "-=Spudley=-"
>>>>>>> <-=Spudley=-@work.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> Indeed.. They have to be seriously stupid mugu's to get sucked
>>>>>>> into accepting so many deliveries of pure garbage and pay for
>>>>>>> it, over and over again.. DHL must love these guys! lol..  My
>>>>>>> all time favorite is the Anus Laptops thread tho..  :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hook, Line ...?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Speaking of all time favourites, here's a bona-fide classic
>>>>>> http://snipurl.com/spudley
>>>>>
>>>>> FUCK OFF.
>>>>
>>>> Lead the way Spuddles.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> PS. thanks for the hasty bite
>>>
>>> I guess one could say, "I like to make short work of the retards
>>> that try to taunt me, in a timely fashion".
>>>
>>
>> lol.. it took you all that time to come up with that?  ;)
>
>Didn't want to respond too quickly, due to the speed at which the news group 
>adversaries take to absorb posts, I'd say that it was most considerate and 
>more in line with their slow mental faculties. ;-)
>They tend to get a bit snippety if you reply too fast, like they can't 
>handle the pace, so they make up a sort of pithy whinge about it.

My guess was you were feeling bored so came looking for something to
respond to. ;)

>ps,
>Is this group an excuse for a response timed speed test?

Yeah.. kinda like the broadband speed test site.

>I hope that my responding to your post in under 1/2 an hour doesn't make you 
>feel uncomfortable. :)

If I end up having to have therapy as a result, expect to hear from my
lawyer.. ex Nigel's legal team. lol..

>I'm working late tonight, as usual.
>
>Cheers, Spud.
>
>
>
>
>