🚀 go-pugleaf

-=Spudley=- wrote:
> "Je�us" <none@all.org> wrote in message news:4850c011@news.x-privat.org...
>> -=Spudley=- wrote:
>>> "Je�us" <none@all.org> wrote in message 
>>> news:4845d73e@news.x-privat.org...
>>>> -=Spudley=- wrote:
>>>>> "Je�us" <none@all.org> wrote in message 
>>>>> news:4845cd0d@news.x-privat.org...
>>>>>> -=Spudley=- wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Je�us" <none@all.org> wrote in message 
>>>>>>> news:4844f9b0$1@news.x-privat.org...
>>>>>>>> -=Spudley=- wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Je�us" <none@all.org> wrote in message 
>>>>>>>>> news:4844d4bc@news.x-privat.org...
>>>>>>>>>> -=Spudley=- wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm last in this book.
>>>>>>>>>> So change your name to aardvark then.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Now you nearly went and spoilt it.
>>>>>>>>> Besides how does changing ones name to aardvark make you last in 
>>>>>>>>> the book?
>>>>>>>> It'd cure you of being the last, obviously.
>>>>>>>> Unless it was a reverse telephone directory, I suppose...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How many people by the name of "aardvark" are listed in the telephone 
>>>>>>> directory? My guess is none.
>>>>>> Err, well that would be the point of my suggestion to make you FIRST 
>>>>>> in the book instead of being last in the book. Wouldn't it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At least in Australia you would be first... in the U.S, you'd most 
>>>>>> certainly NOT be first in the book.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Besides all that feldercarb, since when has this been a telephone book?
>>>>> It reads more like a really bad novel than a telephone book.
>>>> You did not specify which book.
>>> Yeh I did, "This book".
>> OK, I give up - which fucking book?!?
> 
> lol - This fucking book.
> You mean this isn't a book?

Err, OK.