Article View: aus.net.mail
Article #57Re: fingering e-mail addresses
From: Jacques Distler
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 1999 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 1999 00:00
52 lines
2984 bytes
2984 bytes
In article <37D27ACE.B9548F91@e-softinc.com>, Thomas Reinke <reinke@e-softinc.com> wrote: >And unless i miss my guess (tested this on Sendmail on RedHat 5.2), >the default install always responds with a 250 OK, even if the >address is not valid. So does our ISP (8.8.7, 8.9.1 respectively). Really, I tried this on Redhat 6.0 (Sendmail 8.9.3) and AIX (Sendmail 8.8.8), and found: 3> telnet xxxx smtp Trying nnn.nnn.nnn.nnn... Connected to xxxx.utexas.edu. Escape character is '^]'. 220 xxxx.utexas.edu ESMTP Sendmail 8.9.3/8.9.3; Sun, 5 Sep 1999 10:39:43 -0500 HELO yyyy.utexas.edu 250 xxxx.utexas.edu Hello IDENT:NwxyXYA7+fffYaAa0y/OWQmavji2QBPu@yyyy.utexas.edu [mmm.mmm.mmm.mmm], pleased to meet you MAIL FROM: me@yyyy.utexas.edu 250 me@yyyy.utexas.edu... Sender ok RCPT TO: zarquan@xxxx.utexas.edu 550 zarquan@xxxx.utexas.edu... User unknown RCPT TO: zarquan@physics.utexas.edu 550 zarquan@xxxx.utexas.edu... Addressee unknown RCPT TO: ralph@xxxx.utexas.edu 250 ralph@xxxx.utexas.edu... Recipient ok QUIT 221 xxxx.utexas.edu closing connection Connection closed by foreign host. It's true that the RFC does not *require* the 250 response to be accurate. But in my experience almost all mail servers do respond correctly. >Tollef Fog Heen wrote: >> >> distler@golem.ph.utexas.edu (Jacques Distler) writes: >> >> > There's no way to disable *that* without breaking SMTP (which is why only >> > a bozo would disable VRFY). >> >> There was a discussion regarding this on bugtraq some time ago, where >> spammers had used exactly this method of gathering addresses. Which is probably why some Sendmail setups (including, evidently, that of the poster) have been modified to conceal this information until after the DATA portion. Jacques -- PGP public key: http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/~distler/distler.asc
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<distler-0509991105430001@192.168.0.1>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<37CB6A34.7178@cygnus.uwa.edu> <7qqnji$q2l$1@lios.apana.org.au> <37d985c4.7783654@news.earthlink.net> <distler-0409992051420001@192.168.0.1> <37D21508.6828@cygnus.uwa.edu> <distler-0509990250210001@192.168.0.1> <m37lm57ew4.fsf@ft193216227195.dep.no> <37D27ACE.B9548F91@e-softinc.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10952f,23199f1e3f0d22e7
X-Google-Attributes: gid10952f,public
X-Google-Thread: 108c83,23199f1e3f0d22e7
X-Google-Attributes: gid108c83,public
X-Google-Thread: 1090e7,37552a33cbddf452
X-Google-Attributes: gid1090e7,public
From: distler@golem.ph.utexas.edu (Jacques Distler)
Subject: Re: fingering e-mail addresses
Date: 1999/09/05
Message-ID: <distler-0509991105430001@192.168.0.1>
X-Deja-AN: 521343285
References: <37CB6A34.7178@cygnus.uwa.edu> <7qqnji$q2l$1@lios.apana.org.au> <37d985c4.7783654@news.earthlink.net> <distler-0409992051420001@192.168.0.1> <37D21508.6828@cygnus.uwa.edu> <distler-0509990250210001@192.168.0.1> <m37lm57ew4.fsf@ft193216227195.dep.no> <37D27ACE.B9548F91@e-softinc.com>
X-Image-URL: http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/~distler/x-image.jpg
X-Face: #m:M:[ZK_2%p0fVui~CU:PB(Lv<2h/^?'zdcs29!62<k:VuJnr=j}IK$ohm&T /gnVR"|LWyKVK{`$&t&`k{]Q^x*"ihe+^hTvWs@IEMtYI5RVzGFBPcMu`}>@#^Fm:<)M w83/\[@#\u?TVrF3fqDjK?
Organization: Physics Department, University of Texas at Austin
Newsgroups: aus.net.mail,aus.computers,comp.security.unix