🚀 go-pugleaf

Brendan Pratt wrote:
> 
> Followups set to aus.net.news
> 
> "Simon Wright" <spam.do.not.delete.the.word.spam@whirlpool.net.au> wrote in
> message
> 
> > Why is this cross-posted into aus.net.access?
> >
> > Do you not take the newsgroup rules seriously, Che?
> 
> Che amongst a number of others, don't give a toss about anyone else,

I was publicly thanked for helping people get access to 
aus.culture.true-blue, while the Taliban castigated me for
the method (crossposting to a.c.t-b and one additional NG 
enabled people to participate in the NG via deja.com for
the many weeks before some newservers carried it.  The Taliban,
who had already been the first to crosspost (LISA'S INAUGRAL
THREAD WAS CROSS-POSTED!!!!!  B^p) hypocritically attacked
MY righteous crossposts..  when clearly, I was the only one
who 'gave a toss about anyone else' trying to PARTICIPATE
in the aus.culture.true-blue NG.

The entire history of the Townsville Taliban is attempts
to PREVENT people from participating.. this is just their latest
attempt.

>  unless it might be some support for their ideology.
> 
> They crosspost when it suits their purpose, 

Well of course, ..as outlined above, the reason crossposts 
are supported in Usenet is because there are often good 
purposes in doing so!   What is unforgivable is the sort
of spam Lisa demonstrated in her initial (crossposted)
thread in a.c.t-b!  Inappropriate content for the other NG's!

Or your plea that all your crossposts are the product of
your incompetence!  B^p 

Intelligent people realise that NG's are intersecting, not
mutually exclusive, sets. 

> and when others complain about it, 

Complain all you like.. no-one listens to such whining Prats.

It's when Lisa and her cronies hypocritically INITIATE 
crossposts but then complain about others doing so, 
and use that as a pretext for murderation, that their fetid
dishonesty really starts to stink! 


> but forget to remove the extra newsgroups when replying to such posts,
> they are then flamed for crossposting

You get flamed for hypocrisy, not crossposting.

Only anal retentives like you use crossposting as
a source of repetitive complaint, in order to avoid the 
substantive issues.