🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: aus.net.policy
Article #575

Re: DNS Registry

#575
From: Philip Ryan
Date: Mon, 27 May 1996 00:00
13 lines
791 bytes
I have no objections in principle to the registration process costing money 
(after all, most ISPs are charging for it now anyway)... but the time for renewal
of current registrations is a trifle soon.

(the first of January 1997 for some)

I don't think that re-registration for prior DN holders
before 12 months have elapsed with the new DNS registry is asking
too much.

Phil Ryan
Melbourne
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4odk4e$hl8_002@internex.net.au>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <4o6v1t$f5o@folk.iinet.net.au>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f4bcb,1dc3422d080819f9
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4bcb,public
From: philryan@world.net (Philip Ryan)
Subject: Re: DNS Registry
Date: 1996/05/27
Message-ID: <4odk4e$hl8_002@internex.net.au>
X-Deja-AN: 156952557
references: <4o6v1t$f5o@folk.iinet.net.au>
organization: connexus.apana.org.au
newsgroups: aus.net.policy