🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: aus.net.policy
Article #587

Re: DNS Registry

#587
From: Mark Dorset
Date: Thu, 30 May 1996 00:00
38 lines
2446 bytes
Stuart Bryant wrote:
> 
> Mark Dorset (mbd@suburbia.net) blurted forth :
> : Stuart Bryant wrote:
> :
> : >   Given that domain names really aren't a marketing tool, I can't see the
> : >  problem. Just give yourself more time.
> :
> : Maybe they're not meant to be, but they certainly are. And your argument of
> : giving yourself time isn't really acceptable - if you have a client who wants
> : a domain name, they don't like waiting for three weeks for their domain name
> : to be processed. Add the increased angst caused on the occasions when their
> : request is rejected for one reason or another causing the process has to begin
> : again, and you can get some clients who are getting very impatient.
> 
>   erm, my argument is acceptable. if a business hasnt factored in 2 weeks for
>  getting their domain registered, then they havent done enough research - a
>  phone call to their isp could give them the answer. the fact they havent, is
>  slackness on their part.
> 
>   also supplying the correct information, and reading the guidelines wouldnt
>  hurt either.

Just because that's how long it takes doesn't mean businesses find it acceptable.
Are you saying if you rang telstra to get phone lines installed and they told you
it would take a month before they could do something about it you wouldn't feel
the least bit annoyed that you want something and have to wait for so long?

In my experience in different business related fields, yesterday isn't fast enough
once a company decides it wants something. Even when the guidelines are adhered to
there are always grey-area applications. I've registered domains where I was amazed
that it was rejected and other where I was pleasantly surprised that they were 
accepted...

Best regards,

Mark Dorset
Technical Details
Message-ID: <31ACFBAD.6BEC@suburbia.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <4o6v1t$f5o@folk.iinet.net.au> <31A8F2EF.41C67EA6@telstra.net> <4obisn$kjp@opera.iinet.net.au> <31AA8D3E.3B7D@suburbia.net> <4of4h7$h76@opera.iinet.net.au>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f4bcb,1dc3422d080819f9
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4bcb,public
From: Mark Dorset <mbd@suburbia.net>
Subject: Re: DNS Registry
Date: 1996/05/30
Message-ID: <31ACFBAD.6BEC@suburbia.net>
X-Deja-AN: 157472302
references: <4o6v1t$f5o@folk.iinet.net.au> <31A8F2EF.41C67EA6@telstra.net> <4obisn$kjp@opera.iinet.net.au> <31AA8D3E.3B7D@suburbia.net> <4of4h7$h76@opera.iinet.net.au>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Suburbia Public Access Network
mime-version: 1.0
reply-to: mbd@suburbia.net
newsgroups: aus.net.policy
x-mailer: Mozilla 3.0b3 (Win95; I)