Re: BIZ.AU Domain Proposal

Article View: aus.net.policy

Article #6

From: Danny
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 1996 00:00

16 lines
1054 bytes

In a biz.au delegation proposal,
Michael Malone <pariah@creole.iinet.net.au> wrote:

[ requirements for domain in biz.au ]

>5) is not a word defined to be vulgar in a standard Australian English
>   dictionary word,

Sheesh, now we have censorship of the DNS.  Isn't this outright 
discrimination against people selling "vulgar" products, anyway?

We need to be able to say,
f--k.biz.au :-)

Danny.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <585t0b$rfr@staff.cs.su.oz.au>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <57vs4f$nfl@opera.iinet.net.au>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fd95d,7871d38473381aff,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidfd95d,public
X-Google-Thread: fa7f6,7871d38473381aff,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidfa7f6,public
X-Google-Thread: f4bcb,5ddecd04458cede8
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4bcb,public
From: danny@cs.su.oz.au (Danny)
Subject: Re: BIZ.AU Domain Proposal
Date: 1996/12/05
Message-ID: <585t0b$rfr@staff.cs.su.oz.au>
X-Deja-AN: 202467287
distribution: aus
references: <57vs4f$nfl@opera.iinet.net.au>
organization: Basser Dept of Computer Science, Uni of Sydney, Australia
newsgroups: aus.net.policy,aus.org.efa,aus.censorship

Reply to Parent Message