🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <GNB.95Dec20090604@dame.bby.com.au> Gregory Bond, gnb@bby.com.au writes:
> [I am assuming Phil uses the !cyberspam! or similar convention.  If
> he's not, then he should!]
In article <GNB.95Dec20090604@dame.bby.com.au>, you write:
>[I am assuming Phil uses the !cyberspam! or similar convention.  If
>he's not, then he should!]

The retromod! convention is used for ad cancels; I believe that it's more
appropriate than the cyberspam! convention. The details are:

        * the Path: contains 'retromod'
        * there is an X-Cancelled-By: line
        * the Message-ID: consists of: <cancel.message-id>


When I *move* articles out of aus.general (which is what I do for
excessive crossposts), there is no convention, so I don't do anything
special. I also assume, since the article being moved isn't being
cancelled, that this is not as important as it is with cancels. (When
the robocanceller starts, I can desist from this.)


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Phil Herring                                         revdoc@uow.edu.au
 (c)1995 Phil Herring. This article may not be reproduced for profit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------