Re: aus.general cancels

Article View: aus.net.policy

Article #650

#650

From: xtdn
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 1995 00:00

13 lines
1166 bytes

dnagle@hades.omen.com.au (Dave Nagle) writes:
> [ reasonable and well argued point that Phil cancelled based on content ]
>
> In the meantime, could I suggest that you either leave the
> content based cancels alone, or drop the "with the consent of the
> group" bit from your cancels.

This I completely agree with.  Phil, I have no stake in the thread(s) which
you cancel, frankly I don't even know what the thread you cancelled was
about.  I do have an emotional stake in censorship and I think too many
people already decide what I can and cannot read (view, etc) and where I
may read it.  I don't want you making these decisions for me.  Thanks for
your effort.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1995Dec9.191237.25030@levels.unisa.edu.au>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <491i4s$qgd@hades.omen.com.au> <49aqng$iq5@wabbit.cc.uow.edu.au> <49p4sk$dg8@hades.omen.com.au>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f4bcb,ba742921f266c6cf
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4bcb,public
From: xtdn@levels.unisa.edu.au
Subject: Re: aus.general cancels
Date: 1995/12/09
Message-ID: <1995Dec9.191237.25030@levels.unisa.edu.au>
X-Deja-AN: 121543596
distribution: world
references: <491i4s$qgd@hades.omen.com.au> <49aqng$iq5@wabbit.cc.uow.edu.au> <49p4sk$dg8@hades.omen.com.au>
organization: University of South Australia
newsgroups: aus.net.policy

Reply to Parent Message