Article View: aus.net.status
Article #324Re: "Specific Performance Clause" in AARNET contract w/ Telstra?
From: Frank Horowitz
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 00:00
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 00:00
60 lines
2826 bytes
2826 bytes
In article <487173$1d8@kryten.it.com.au>, andrew@kryten.it.com.au (Andrew Howell) wrote: >Michael O'Reilly (michael@metal.iinet.net.au) wrote: >: >>>>> "Toivo" == Toivo Pedaste <toivo@ucs.uwa.edu.au> writes: >: >: > The WA link has losses of about 30% to 40% during the busy half of >: > they. This falls outside the bounds of acceptable. >: >: Too right. :( >: >: I'm seeing around 19% in the morning (iinet.gw.au --> archie.au), >: rising to silly heights in the afternoon/evening. >: > >Try 50% packet loss right now :( > >From Telstra's Service Agreement: > >2.5 If the average weekly Network Performance Level drops below the level > indicates in the Schedule at the Telstra Internet Point of Presence > where the Customer Premises or Nominated Users Premises are connected, > Telstra will rebate to the Customer an amount equal to the Minimum > Access Charge for the Internet Service provided to the relevant > Customer Premises or Nominated User Premises over the > period. > > >Does this mean Telstra owes everyone in WA they service money? :) > (I started this little thread several days back.) By now, I've *personally* wasted in excess of 2.5 EFT days working around this problem. (Not to mention spent an unknown sum on a 5.5 hour modem call to our Brisbane office this afternoon. We've also had to resort to asking the Director of the Australian Geodynamics CRC to hand carry a laptop to Melbourne, merely to guarantee that some data will arrive there in time for a meeting tomorrow.) My patience and sense of humour have long since evaporated on this topic. I imagine that similar stories to this must be rife among others needing to communicate to/from W.A. The aggregate cost to the community must be in the tens of thousands of dollars by now. Perhaps more. Hello, Telstra. Anybody listening? Hmmmmmmm. (Oh, yes. Once again, I'm speaking purely in a personal capacity here, and not in any fashion speaking for the CSIRO. However, the CSIRO-WAN meeting is in a few short days...) -- Dr. Frank Horowitz; Principal Research Scientist; frank@ned.dem.csiro.au CSIRO-Exploration & Mining, PO Box 437, Nedlands, WA 6009, AUSTRALIA Tel. (09)389-8421 (Int'l +61 9 389 8421), FAX (09)389-1906 (+61 9 389 1906)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<frank-1311952135330001@192.149.36.132>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<frank-0811951549220001@192.149.36.132> <487173$1d8@kryten.it.com.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 107651,56bb11730fe26ab5 X-Google-Attributes: gid107651,public From: frank@ned.dem.csiro.au (Frank Horowitz) Subject: Re: "Specific Performance Clause" in AARNET contract w/ Telstra? Date: 1995/11/13 Message-ID: <frank-1311952135330001@192.149.36.132> X-Deja-AN: 119266956 references: <frank-0811951549220001@192.149.36.132> <487173$1d8@kryten.it.com.au> organization: Dunno, it's around here somewhere... newsgroups: aus.net.status