🚀 go-pugleaf

hiscdcj@lux.latrobe.edu.au (Dwayne Jones-Evans) writes:

[objection to defense of Rosie Cross]

>I had no desire to hear her opinions. I was making a comment on her
>personality.  The worth of her opinions flows on from that.

You know, Dwayne, this is the only problem thing I've actually found
about you to date. Opinions should be analysed critically and free
from preconceptions of the personality of the person who wrote
them. You can derive your own concept of the person's opinion to 
do this but you must not think you are being reasonable if you think
that someone you hate cannot have a right to be heard, let alone be
right. Many people have made that last mistake and it sucks.


>: But their is a line (where it exists is a matter of opinion), of which
>: I truly believe, "Dwayne" has crossed. 

>Ooooh, because I said a nasty word? What, pray tell, is the difference
>between flaming someone using swear words, and using 'nice' language,
>other than politeness? The sentiment is the same. Sounds like hypocrisy
>to me: "You can tell people that my mother has sex with maggot-ridden
>camels from outer space, and that's okay, but you said b*gger and f&ck,
>and THAT'S GOING TOO FAR!"

>Hmph.

In *my* book the 'line' is explained above, and fucken shit bugger words
are harmless.

[..]

>Well, given the votes for and against me so far, your opinion is
>definately in the minority.

The majority *can* be utterly full of shit.


>Dwayne.

Engine.