🚀 go-pugleaf

trx140@xmission.com (theurgy) writes:

>cjmount@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU (Christopher Mountford) writes:

>...elided...

>>Many people don't realise the authority structures which exist on
>>the net. Mostly they are a lynch mob of supporters of the 
>>present crappy system. They wish to confine debate to opinions
>>within a given range. This is the way western free-society keeps
>>freedom under control and keeps indoctrination and opression in
>>place. 

>Regurgitated ideological rhetoric. Where do they teach them this crap?

What a thoughtful response. It wouldn't take much for the average
person to see how you failed to address what is part of many people's
oppression. Fine. Call me names, it saves actually thinking.

>Not only is the net the closest thing to free speech we've ever had, but
>Rosie's desire, as expressed in her earlier post, is to confine the debate
>in just the way you're claiming. Frankly, Rosie's a whiner, and the fact 
>that she's female has little to do with how she's treated.

>Felicitations,
>              M.

Yes the net is the closest thing to free speech we've had. Why is a 
large jump to partial solution enough for you?

Rosie desired anyone who agreed with her to support her in registering
unsatisfaction with Dwayne to him. She is not trying to confine the debate,
just admit that we can all be more open minded and REFRAIN from flaming
and abusing NOT ON THE BASIS OF SEX, but on the basis of "REGURGITATED
IDEOLOGICAL RHETORIC" you may not get it but many are starting to understand.
Thankfully no matter how ideological or regurgitated, this rhetoric 
actually has basis. Try it on, think about it. I know it's a leap of
faith but then I think you could manage to actually say something else
than a dismissal.


Engine.