🚀 go-pugleaf

Christopher Mountford (cjmount@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU) wrote:
> larryc@teleport.com (Larry Caldwell) writes:

> >L. J. Farthing <farthing@leland.Stanford.EDU> wrote:
> >>(Zebee Johnstone) writes:

> >Since when do women get all weak-kneed and flustery at the sight of a 
> >couple four-letter words?  Weren't you the one who recently declaimed 
> >that the male solution to female verbal abuse was for men to develop the 
> >same facility with language that women have?  Or was that someone else?

> Hello? <poke><poke> 

> We are not talking about saying, for example, fuck off. We are talking about
> systematic rejetion of the legitimacy of feminist perspective, manifested
> sometimes with a 'fuck off' or a 'you're full of shit', but no-one is being
> weak-kneed and flustery.

I think there is a 'wobbling' going on here, and I am having a bit of 
trouble knowing what is being addressed.  Are we talking "about 
systematic rejection of the legitimacy of feminist perspective" and if we 
are should we be in the context of this thread?  Or are we discussing a 
-- not to put too tight a definition on it -- "systematic" rejection of 
the legitimacy of (some? most? all?) women's perspectives -- I point back 
to the *plural* -- on the 'net?

I mean, there is nothing unusual, mysterious, or satanic about the 
"systematic rejection of the legitimacy" of *any* perspective, but the 
second...*that's* a pathology.
-- 
 (__)    Sourcerer       
/(<>)\ O|O|O|O||O||O     
 \../  |OO|||O|||O|O  "I rise, a corpse already wept, and live."
  ||   OO|||OO||O||O                               -- Maximian