🚀 go-pugleaf

tim@duh.cs.adfa.oz.au (Tim Benham) writes:

>>Sexism on the net is an issue of electronic communications. Yes you
>>should take everyone seriously if you are to be taken for something
>>other than a joke yourself.

>What has "sexism on the net" got to do with rosiex's complaint? 

Well it's the answer to the supject heading.

>Her
>complaint was an attempt to whip up a PC lynch mob against Dwayne
>because of something he said which had no bearing whatsoever on her
>gender and a great deal to do with her journalistic exploitation of a
>particular minority (ravers). Just because rosiex found crying "sexism" 
>easier than answering Dwayne's criticisms doesn't make it so.

No but it could be anyway. And I know it is. If what *really* happened
was not an issue of sexism, how is that relevant? She came in here 
complaining of sexism and got rejected for that. I know how sexist the
net is and don't appreciate people saying it's all in my head, or in
someone elses. Perhaps there is no sexism on your mailing list. Perhaps
Rosie is full of shit. I don't know and I don't care. It is about 
legitimising the complaint of sexism because I've seen it alot.

What ends up happening is people end up writing the whole question
off as contentless bullshit without an acutal considered reply.
Not always, but ... now for example:

>[several k. of radical post-structualist b.s. deleted for net's sake]


>Tim J.Benham                                       bentj93@cs.adfa.oz.au


Engine.